umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The pivotal position of 'liaison people': facilitating a research utilisation intervention in policy agencies
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, ISSN 1744-2648, E-ISSN 1744-2656, Vol. 14, no 1, p. 7-34Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper explores the enormous variation in views, championing behaviours and impacts of liaison people: staff nominated to facilitate, tailor and promote SPIRIT (a research utilisation intervention trial in six Australian health policy agencies). Liaison people made cost/benefit analyses: they weighed the value of participation against its risks and demands in the context of organisational goals, knowledge utilisation norms, epistemology and leadership support. There was a degree of self-fulfilment (organisations got what they put in), but SPIRIT could not always be tailored to address local knowledge needs. We present nine propositions for identifying and supporting liaison people in similar interventions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Policy Press, 2018. Vol. 14, no 1, p. 7-34
Keywords [en]
research utilisation, faciliation, championing, process evaluation
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-146585DOI: 10.1332/174426416X14817284217163ISI: 000427722000002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-146585DiVA, id: diva2:1198665
Available from: 2018-04-18 Created: 2018-04-18 Last updated: 2018-06-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(213 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 213 kBChecksum SHA-512
c2d6f7dcd042e559f458020610e83779ddcf3b6b4636910b23371bb51f996361316c7ab260be29c642b8cd8ceb2321297bba5344e6f5745b97dc310e7e54d75e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Gallego, Gisselle

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gallego, Gisselle
By organisation
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience
In the same journal
Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf