umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stöd för bedömning gällande omprövningar av djurförbud: -Vad säger domstolarna?
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.
2018 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Support for assessment regarding reconsidering of animal prohibition : - What do the courts say (English)
Abstract [en]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate which legal sources the Swedish courts base their rulings on, regarding reconsidering of animal prohibition and if this provides guidance in future assessments. Further on was the purpose to investigate to which extent animal prohibition is decided, reconsidered and reversed by the county administrative boards between the years 2013–2017. To find out which legal sources the courts base their rulings on, 75 court rulings was audited from administrative courts and administrative court of appeals. To investigate which extent animal prohibition is decided, reconsidered and reversed, statistics from the Swedish Agriculture Agency was audited. The result indicate that some guidance on how decisions can be motivated, can be assisted by court rulings. Legal sources, that the courts support their motivations on, that may be indicative in future assessments regarding reconsinderings of animal prohibition, are for example the administrative court of appeals practice from Jönköping (case nr 1777–11). The statistics from the Swedish Agriculture Agency shows that the county administrative boards decided on animal prohibition on average 81,5% of the initiated animal prohibition trials and reversed on average 29% of the submitted applications for reverse of animal prohibition. The applications for reverse of animal prohibition that are subsequently appealed to court are rarely reversed, only 2 of the 75 court decisions reversed the animal prohibition. The guidance available at present from the courts is limited.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 17
Keywords [en]
Animal prohibition, legal sources, case-law, administrative courts
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-148893OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-148893DiVA, id: diva2:1217151
Educational program
Master of Science Programme in Environmental Health
Available from: 2018-06-13 Created: 2018-06-12 Last updated: 2018-06-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(211 kB)19 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 211 kBChecksum SHA-512
8b1141dba1fd22394deff2883cace23d49dfb7824544ebe6dbc29d830487c52b2ba08f286a70810786db65ecd33a3ef71731148309d79a573da1c03f246ab6e8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 19 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 38 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf