umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Applying the Consolidated Framework for implementation research to agricultural safety and health: Barriers, facilitators, and evaluation opportunities
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health. Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safety: Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing, Cooperstown, NY, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7232-9417
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Safety Science, ISSN 0925-7535, E-ISSN 1879-1042, Vol. 107, p. 99-108Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: Within agriculture, forestry, and fishing safety and health research, little progress has been made to implement evidence-based interventions into practice. Beginning in the early 2000s, much work has been done to address the leading cause of agricultural fatalities: tractor overturns. In this time a Rollover Protective Structure Rebate Program has been developed to assist farmers in installing safety equipment to prevent these fatalities. In the current study, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research is adapted so that it may be used to evaluate and improve the scaling up of this intervention. Methods: Each construct specified in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was incorporated into a survey, which was distributed to a 77 member Coalition of agricultural stakeholders. Stakeholders were asked to rate each construct based on how important the individual felt it was to the implementation of the National ROPS Rebate Program on a scale of 1 (not at all important) to 5 (extremely important). Results: Using the mean score for each construct as a starting point, 23 constructs were selected for inclusion in an evaluation tool which will be used, in future studies, to evaluate the implementation of the National ROPS Rebate Program. Conclusions: Though the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was designed for use in the clinical setting, this study is a first step in applying it to occupational health and safety. The insight gained through this study will provide a foundation for future work on this initiative, as well as in public health.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2018. Vol. 107, p. 99-108
Keywords [en]
Research translation, Implementation science, Widespread implementation, Evaluation
National Category
Construction Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-148705DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.008ISI: 000432767800010Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85046366505OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-148705DiVA, id: diva2:1223526
Available from: 2018-06-25 Created: 2018-06-25 Last updated: 2019-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Tinc, Pamela J.Weinehall, LarsLindvall, Kristina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tinc, Pamela J.Weinehall, LarsLindvall, Kristina
By organisation
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
Safety Science
Construction Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 108 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf