umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Applying the Consolidated Framework for implementation research to agricultural safety and health: Barriers, facilitators, and evaluation opportunities
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för epidemiologi och global hälsa. Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safety: Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing, Cooperstown, NY, USA.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-7232-9417
Umeå universitet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för epidemiologi och global hälsa.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: Safety Science, ISSN 0925-7535, E-ISSN 1879-1042, Vol. 107, s. 99-108Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: Within agriculture, forestry, and fishing safety and health research, little progress has been made to implement evidence-based interventions into practice. Beginning in the early 2000s, much work has been done to address the leading cause of agricultural fatalities: tractor overturns. In this time a Rollover Protective Structure Rebate Program has been developed to assist farmers in installing safety equipment to prevent these fatalities. In the current study, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research is adapted so that it may be used to evaluate and improve the scaling up of this intervention. Methods: Each construct specified in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was incorporated into a survey, which was distributed to a 77 member Coalition of agricultural stakeholders. Stakeholders were asked to rate each construct based on how important the individual felt it was to the implementation of the National ROPS Rebate Program on a scale of 1 (not at all important) to 5 (extremely important). Results: Using the mean score for each construct as a starting point, 23 constructs were selected for inclusion in an evaluation tool which will be used, in future studies, to evaluate the implementation of the National ROPS Rebate Program. Conclusions: Though the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was designed for use in the clinical setting, this study is a first step in applying it to occupational health and safety. The insight gained through this study will provide a foundation for future work on this initiative, as well as in public health.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier, 2018. Vol. 107, s. 99-108
Nyckelord [en]
Research translation, Implementation science, Widespread implementation, Evaluation
Nationell ämneskategori
Byggproduktion
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-148705DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.008ISI: 000432767800010Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85046366505OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-148705DiVA, id: diva2:1223526
Tillgänglig från: 2018-06-25 Skapad: 2018-06-25 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-04-24Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Personposter BETA

Tinc, Pamela J.Weinehall, LarsLindvall, Kristina

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Tinc, Pamela J.Weinehall, LarsLindvall, Kristina
Av organisationen
Institutionen för epidemiologi och global hälsa
I samma tidskrift
Safety Science
Byggproduktion

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 119 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf