umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Goods, Principles, and Values in the Brighouse, Ladd, Loeb and Swift Framework for Educational Policy-making
Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier.
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: Studies in Philosophy and Education, ISSN 0039-3746, E-ISSN 1573-191X, Vol. 37, nr 6, s. 631-645Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

This article presents the promising framework for educational decision makers developed by Brighouse, Ladd, Loeb, and Swift (BLLS). The framework consists of an account of the educational goods, distributional principles and independent values at stake in education, and a method for making policy decisions on the basis of these and solid social science. I present three criticisms of this approach. The frst says that the derivation of educational goods proceeds on the basis of a too narrow conception of values. I suggest that this foundation should consist of an overlapping consensus, rather than fourishing. The second criticism has to do with the way that the distributive principles are characterized. I argue that BLLS’s characterization of distributive principles should be complemented with accounts of what domains of social life these principles regulate and a specifcation of whether the distributive principles should be understood as applying over time or at specifc instances. The fnal criticism is that BLLS’s conception of independent values focuses solely on values that constrain the pursuit of educational goods. I claim that this part of the framework should be revised to include aspects of values that also support this pursuit. I conclude arguing that the BLLS frameworks should be further developed rather than rejected.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Springer Netherlands, 2018. Vol. 37, nr 6, s. 631-645
Nyckelord [en]
Educational goods, Childhood goods, Distributive justice, Distribuendum, Educational policy making, Trade-ofs in education
Nationell ämneskategori
Etik
Forskningsämne
praktisk filosofi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-151162DOI: 10.1007/s11217-018-9619-2ISI: 000445401700007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-151162DiVA, id: diva2:1242758
Projekt
Likvärdighet i skolan
Forskningsfinansiär
Vetenskapsrådet, 2013-2337Tillgänglig från: 2018-08-29 Skapad: 2018-08-29 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-10-05Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(816 kB)75 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 816 kBChecksumma SHA-512
705690d44a054a3eb5ba24f14d50185a66fbcbc1eb05e283d388ee08571c40b3cb5ce49bcc69004f11a861750444cdba6b1245b233a8b5088ed3a18c29f5f552
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Lindblom, Lars

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Lindblom, Lars
Av organisationen
Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier
I samma tidskrift
Studies in Philosophy and Education
Etik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 75 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 654 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf