umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sociodemographic determinants and health outcome variation in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A register-based study
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 13, no 6, article id e0199170Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Socioeconomic status, origin or demographic attributes shall not determine the quality of healthcare delivery, according to e.g. United Nations and European Union rules. Health equity has been defined as the absence of systematic disparities and unwarranted differences between groups defined by differences in social advantages. A study was performed to investigate whether this was applicable to type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) care in a setting with universal, tax-funded healthcare. Methods: This retrospective registry-study was based on patient-level data from individuals diagnosed with T1D during 2010-2011 (n = 16,367) in any of seven Swedish county councils (covering -65% of the Swedish population). Health equity in T1D care was analysed through multivariate regression analyses on absolute HbA1c level at one-year follow-up, one-year change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and one-year change in cardiovascular risk score, using selected sociodemographic dimensions as case-mix factors. Results: Higher educational level was consistently associated with lower levels of HbA1c, and so was being married. Never married was associated with worse eGFR development, and lower educational level was associated with higher cardiovascular risk. Women had higher HbA1c levels than men, and glucose control was significantly worse in patients below the age of 25. Conclusion: Patients' sociodemographic profile was strongly associated with absolute levels of risk factor control in T1 D, but also with an increased annual deterioration in eGFR. Whether these systematic differences stem from patient-related problems or healthcare organisational shortcomings is a matter for further research. The results, though, highlight the need for intensified diabetes management education and secondary prevention directed towards T1D patients, taking sociodemographic characteristics into account.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Public library science , 2018. Vol. 13, no 6, article id e0199170
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology Endocrinology and Diabetes
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-150768DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199170ISI: 000436793500006PubMedID: 29958293OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-150768DiVA, id: diva2:1244389
Available from: 2018-08-31 Created: 2018-08-31 Last updated: 2019-05-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1892 kB)80 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1892 kBChecksum SHA-512
3bcc1aca99846ae7d340c57ac5b793616a49912e2bdd97d91233107058f382cc90f5f7bc3cecad09b16655280b8b2cf06b9477b76a80948efb79c1ce8c349b46
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Lilja, Mikael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lilja, Mikael
By organisation
Family Medicine
In the same journal
PLoS ONE
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and EpidemiologyEndocrinology and Diabetes

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 80 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 112 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf