umu.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Conditionals in therapy and counseling sessions: therapists' and clients' uses of what-if constructions
Umeå universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Institutionen för språkstudier. Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6800-9050
2019 (Engelska)Ingår i: Journal of Pragmatics, ISSN 0378-2166, E-ISSN 1879-1387, Vol. 140, s. 112-126Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Based on transcribed spoken data, this study explores therapists’ and clients’ uses of what-if constructions in therapy and counseling sessions. It seeks to establish how these constructions are used, whether there are usage differences between these two groups of speakers, and, if so, how such differences can be explained. The study concludes that both therapists and clients use what if, but they do so to satisfy different communicative needs. Clients primarily use what if to convey worry and doubt (What if don’t like it there?), whereas therapists use what if to summarize and reconstrue their clients' worries and to present alternative perspectives and entertain potential consequences (What if you gave up your guilt?). Both groups of speakers use what if to prompt (re)enactment of scenarios, often in connection with metarepresented speech and thought (I was like, “What if he is here?”). The study offers linguistic support for clinical observations concerning the prevalence of what-if reasoning in anxiety disorders, and additionally illustrates how therapists use language to trigger reality-distancing in their clients. Through a systematic application of Chilton’s Deictic Space Theory, the study demonstrates the utility of a cognitive linguistic approach to the consideration of interactive spoken data.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2019. Vol. 140, s. 112-126
Nyckelord [en]
conditional constructions, what if, therapy, contrastive construal, Deictic Space Theory
Nationell ämneskategori
Jämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistik
Forskningsämne
lingvistik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-153775DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-153775DiVA, id: diva2:1267517
Tillgänglig från: 2018-12-03 Skapad: 2018-12-03 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-01-28Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextURL

Personposter BETA

Hartman, Jenny

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Hartman, Jenny
Av organisationen
Institutionen för språkstudier
I samma tidskrift
Journal of Pragmatics
Jämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 117 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf