umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Household Preferences to Reduce Their Greenhouse Gas Footprint: A Comparative Study from Four European Cities
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health. Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Sustainability, ISSN 2071-1050, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 10, no 11, article id 4044Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper investigates households’ preferences to reduce their carbon footprint (CF) measured in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). It assumes that a substantial CF reduction of households is essential to reach the 1.5 ◦C goal under the Paris Agreement. Data was collected in four mid-size cities in France, Germany, Norway, and Sweden. Quantitative data was obtained from 308 households using a CF calculator based on a questionnaire, and a simulation game. The latter investigated households’ preferences when being confronted with the objective to reduce their CF by 50 percent by 2030 in a voluntary and forced scenario. Our results show that the greater the CO2e-reduction potential of a mitigation action, the less willing a household was to implement that action. Households preferred actions with moderate lifestyle changes foremost in the food sector. Voluntarily, households reached a 25% footprint reduction by 2030. To reach a substantial reduction of 50 percent, households needed to choose actions that meant considerable lifestyle changes, mainly related to mobility. Given our results, the 1.5 ◦C goal is unlikely to be realizable currently, unless households receive major policy support. Lastly, the strikingly similar preferences of households in the four European cities investigated seem to justify strong EU and international policies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2018. Vol. 10, no 11, article id 4044
Keywords [en]
Greenhouse gases, CO2, emission, households, preferences, climate change, mitigation, Paris agreement, Europe, carbon footprint
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-154008DOI: 10.3390/su10114044OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-154008DiVA, id: diva2:1269829
Available from: 2018-12-11 Created: 2018-12-11 Last updated: 2018-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2130 kB)61 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2130 kBChecksum SHA-512
d95f66d38e395cf1fb90060de2bd2a49b94f9ba98f3ae5dc27979f732a412bc7eb219fbf20cf57644a0f5e4903d5254a4b0de4acc119be3f47715f26b69d7f86
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Sköld, BoreAndersson, CamillaNilsson, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sköld, BoreAndersson, CamillaNilsson, Maria
By organisation
Epidemiology and Global HealthDepartment of Radiation Sciences
In the same journal
Sustainability
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and EpidemiologyOccupational Health and Environmental Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 61 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 155 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf