umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Risk prediction for estrogen receptor-specific breast cancers in two large prospective cohorts
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Breast Cancer Research, ISSN 1465-5411, E-ISSN 1465-542X, Vol. 20, article id 147Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Few published breast cancer (BC) risk prediction models consider the heterogeneity of predictor variables between estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) and negative (ER-) tumors. Using data from two large cohorts, we examined whether modeling this heterogeneity could improve prediction.

METHODS: We built two models, for ER+ (ModelER+) and ER- tumors (ModelER-), respectively, in 281,330 women (51% postmenopausal at recruitment) from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. Discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration (the agreement between predicted and observed tumor risks) were assessed both internally and externally in 82,319 postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative study. We performed decision curve analysis to compare ModelER+ and the Gail model (ModelGail) regarding their applicability in risk assessment for chemoprevention.

RESULTS: Parity, number of full-term pregnancies, age at first full-term pregnancy and body height were only associated with ER+ tumors. Menopausal status, age at menarche and at menopause, hormone replacement therapy, postmenopausal body mass index, and alcohol intake were homogeneously associated with ER+ and ER- tumors. Internal validation yielded a C-statistic of 0.64 for ModelER+ and 0.59 for ModelER-. External validation reduced the C-statistic of ModelER+ (0.59) and ModelGail (0.57). In external evaluation of calibration, ModelER+ outperformed the ModelGail: the former led to a 9% overestimation of the risk of ER+ tumors, while the latter yielded a 22% underestimation of the overall BC risk. Compared with the treat-all strategy, ModelER+ produced equal or higher net benefits irrespective of the benefit-to-harm ratio of chemoprevention, while ModelGail did not produce higher net benefits unless the benefit-to-harm ratio was below 50. The clinical applicability, i.e. the area defined by the net benefit curve and the treat-all and treat-none strategies, was 12.7 × 10- 6 for ModelER+ and 3.0 × 10- 6 for ModelGail.

CONCLUSIONS: Modeling heterogeneous epidemiological risk factors might yield little improvement in BC risk prediction. Nevertheless, a model specifically predictive of ER+ tumor risk could be more applicable than an omnibus model in risk assessment for chemoprevention.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2018. Vol. 20, article id 147
Keywords [en]
Breast cancer, EPIC, Estrogen receptor, Prospective cohort, Risk prediction, WHI
National Category
Surgery Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-154579DOI: 10.1186/s13058-018-1073-0ISI: 000452007100001PubMedID: 30509329OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-154579DiVA, id: diva2:1272798
Available from: 2018-12-19 Created: 2018-12-19 Last updated: 2019-01-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1621 kB)73 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1621 kBChecksum SHA-512
a345fd85fb59ea1b08a5c0c0a56b3f0bb920d26c4b7f522e23ebd1f6f08b54e50630a16371143d1524f4956b8032ec6bd79b53438c618d8a00f8f205fced8080
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, AnneSund, Malin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, AnneSund, Malin
By organisation
Nutritional ResearchDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences
In the same journal
Breast Cancer Research
SurgeryCancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 73 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 87 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf