umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comprehensive risk stratification at early follow-up determines prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: European Heart Journal, ISSN 0195-668X, E-ISSN 1522-9645, Vol. 39, no 47, p. 4175-4181Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims: Guidelines recommend a goal-oriented treatment approach in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The aim is to reach a low-risk profile, as determined by a risk assessment instrument. This strategy is incompletely validated. We aimed to investigate the bearing of such risk assessment and the benefit of reaching a low-risk profile.

Methods and results: Five hundred and thirty PAH patients were included. Follow-up assessments performed after a median of 4 (interquartile range 3–5) months were available for 383 subjects. Patients were classified as ‘Low’, ‘Intermediate’, or ‘High risk’ and the benefit of reaching the ‘Low risk’ group was estimated. Survival differed (P < 0.001) between the risk groups at baseline and at follow-up. Survival was similar for patients who remained in or improved to the ‘Low risk’ group. Survival was similar for patients who remained in or worsened to the ‘Intermediate risk’ or ‘High risk’ groups. Irrespective of follow-up risk group, survival was better (P < 0.001) for patients with a higher proportion of variables at low risk. Results were unchanged after excluding patients with idiopathic PAH >65 years at diagnosis, and when patients with idiopathic or connective tissue disease-associated PAH were analysed separately. Patients in the ‘Low risk’ group at follow-up exhibited a reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.1–0.4 in multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex and PAH subset), as compared to patients in the ‘Intermediate risk’ or ‘High risk’ groups.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that comprehensive risk assessments and the aim of reaching a low-risk profile are valid in PAH.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2018. Vol. 39, no 47, p. 4175-4181
Keywords [en]
Prognosis, Survival, Goal-oriented treatment, Guidelines, PAH
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-156617DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx257ISI: 000456854500010PubMedID: 28575277OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-156617DiVA, id: diva2:1290327
Available from: 2019-02-20 Created: 2019-02-20 Last updated: 2019-05-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Söderberg, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hjalmarsson, ClaraSöderberg, Stefan
By organisation
Cardiology
In the same journal
European Heart Journal
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf