umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Portable Sensors Add Reliable Kinematic Measures to the Assessment of Upper Extremity Function
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7431-8335
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences.
2019 (English)In: Sensors, ISSN 1424-8220, E-ISSN 1424-8220, Vol. 19, no 5, article id 1241Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Ordinal scales with low resolution are used to assess arm function in clinic. These scales may be improved by adding objective kinematic measures. The aim was to analyze within-subject, inter-rater and overall reliability (i.e., including within-subject and inter-rater reliability) and check the system's validity of kinematic measures from inertial sensors for two such protocols on one person. Twenty healthy volunteers repeatedly performed two tasks, finger-to-nose and drinking, during two test sessions with two different raters. Five inertial sensors, on the forearms, upper arms and xiphoid process were used. Comparisons against an optical camera system evaluated the measurement validity. Cycle time, range of motion (ROM) in shoulder and elbow were calculated. Bland-Altman plots and linear mixed models including the generalizability (G) coefficient evaluated the reliability of the measures. Within-subject reliability was good to excellent in both tests (G = 0.80-0.97) and may serve as a baseline when assessing upper extremities in future patient groups. Overall reliability was acceptable to excellent (G = 0.77-0.94) for all parameters except elbow axial rotation in finger-to-nose task and both elbow axial rotation and flexion/extension in drinking task, mainly due to poor inter-rater reliability in these parameters. The low to good reliability for elbow ROM probably relates to high within-subject variability. The sensors provided good to excellent measures of cycle time and shoulder ROM in non-disabled individuals and thus have the potential to improve today's assessment of arm function.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2019. Vol. 19, no 5, article id 1241
Keywords [en]
inter-rater reliability, inertial sensor, kinematics, upper limb, arm function
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-158105DOI: 10.3390/s19051241ISI: 000462540400260PubMedID: 30870999OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-158105DiVA, id: diva2:1304597
Available from: 2019-04-12 Created: 2019-04-12 Last updated: 2019-04-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(5517 kB)52 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 5517 kBChecksum SHA-512
f2320f4d2919fb0a75742b087cacc5e091858df9bb450ea7ab2d23abf2905a99fc5356813c4325d27f5442e1f83ff5cc78f7b3f309987823d017ea63da262b7a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Öhberg, FredrikBäcklund, TomasSundström, NinaGrip, Helena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Öhberg, FredrikBäcklund, TomasSundström, NinaGrip, Helena
By organisation
Department of Radiation SciencesRadiation Physics
In the same journal
Sensors
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 52 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 117 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf