umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
EU-rapportering: Skillnader på år 2015 och år 2018: En kvalitativ och kvantitativ undersökning av svenska mediers EU-rapportering
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of culture and media studies.
2019 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Reporting on the EU: differences between 2015 and 2018 : A qualitative and quantitative study of Swedish media's EU reporting (English)
Abstract [en]

This study aimed to investigate whether reporting on the EU in daily press and in public service is different in 2018 compared to 2015. It is also intended to see if there were any similarities or differences between the reporting in the daily press and in public service. The study was also aimed at finding out if journalists have experienced any differences between 2015 and 2018. The media outlets I have used in my research are Dagens Nyheter, Svenska Dagbladet, Sweden’s Television and Sweden’s Radio. The methods used in this study are the quantitative content analysis and the qualitative research interview. For the quantitative content analysis I have gathered material from the news media web pages using the media archive Retriever. For my qualitative research I have interviewed two EU correspondents, one from Dagens Nyheter and one from Svenska Dagbladet. The theoretical framework consists mainly of news evaluation, news selection, uses and gratifications theory and audience orientation.

The result shows that you can’t group daily press together and public service together since the result from the different sources vary. The study also finds that there have been changes when reporting on the EU. Most changes were done by Dagens Nyheter and Sweden’s Radio. They have a bigger variety of subjects, main sources and a national angle in 2018 than they did in 2015. Svenska Dagbladet made some changes, and Sweden’s Television have made no remarkable changes than can be seen in my results.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. , p. 40
Keywords [en]
EU, news, public service, daily press, quantitative content analysis, qualitative research interview, Svenska Dagbladet, Dagens Nyheter, Sweden’s Radio, Sweden’s Television, news evaluation, news selection, audience orientation
National Category
Media and Communications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-158879OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-158879DiVA, id: diva2:1315346
External cooperation
DN, SvD
Educational program
Bachelor Programme in Journalism
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2019-05-13 Created: 2019-05-13 Last updated: 2019-05-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

By organisation
Department of culture and media studies
Media and Communications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf