umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Accountability in the health system of Tamil Nadu, India: exploring its multiple meanings
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7234-3510
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7087-1467
2019 (English)In: Health Research Policy and Systems, ISSN 1478-4505, E-ISSN 1478-4505, Vol. 17, article id 44Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Accountability is increasingly being demanded of public services and is a core aspect of most recent frameworks of health system strengthening. Community-based accountability is an increasingly used strategy, and wasa core aspect of India's flagship National Rural Health Mission (NRHM; 2005-2014). Research on policy implementation has called for policy analysts to go beyond the superficial articulation of a particular policy intervention to study the underlying meaning this has for policy-makers and other actors of the implementation process and to the way in which problems sought to be addressed by the policy have been identified and problematised'.

Methods: This research, focused on state level officials and health NGO leaders, explores the meanings attached to the concept of accountability among a number of key actors during the implementation of the NRHM in the south Indian state of Tamil Nadu. The overall research was guided by an interpretive approach to policy analysis and the problematisation lens. Through in-depth interviews we draw on the interviewees' perspectives on accountability.

Results: The research identifies three distinct perspectives on accountability among the key actors involved in the implementation of the NRHM. One perspective views accountability as the achievement of pre-set targets, the other as efficiency in achieving these targets, and the final one as a transformative process that equalises power differentials between communities and the public health system. We also present the ways in which these differences in perspectives are associated with different programme designs.

Conclusions: This research underlines the importance of going beyond the statements of policy to exploring the underlying beliefs and perspectives in order to more comprehensively understand the dynamics of policy implementation; it further points to the impacts of these perspectives on the design of initiatives in response to the policy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMC , 2019. Vol. 17, article id 44
Keywords [en]
Accountability, Community-based accountability, National Rural Health Mission, Belief structures, problematisation, Policy implementation
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-159067DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0448-8ISI: 000466190800001PubMedID: 31029173OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-159067DiVA, id: diva2:1316921
Available from: 2019-05-21 Created: 2019-05-21 Last updated: 2020-03-26Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Divergences, dissonances and disconnects: implementation of community-based accountability in India’s national rural health mission
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Divergences, dissonances and disconnects: implementation of community-based accountability in India’s national rural health mission
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Accountability of health systems to the individuals and communities they serve is increasingly recognized as a key aspect in efforts at health system strengthening. This has led to a greater focus on efforts to evolve systems that enable communities to hold health systems accountable. In parallel with this change, the governance of public systems has been transformed under the influence of the neo-liberal paradigm of governance. India introduced the flagship National Rural Health Mission (presently termed the National Health Mission) in 2005, to bring about an architectural correction of the health system. One of the five key components of the mission was ‘Communitization’. This component aimed to increase the ownership of the health systems by the communities they serve. As part of this a programme called Community Action for Health (CAH) was piloted in nine states and then rolled out nationally. The implementation diverged from the originally envisaged process in different states.

This PhD research aims to understand the institutional level influences that impact on the implementation of community-based accountability and governance mechanisms and the potential of integrating such processes in the public health system in India. I used qualitative methods to map out the divergences in implementation and sought to understand the reasons for these. Next, I conducted a case study of the southern state of Tamil Nadu, in which I focused on the processes within the apex administrative level of the state.

In addition to mapping two dimensions along which the policy seemed to diverge, I also documented three distinct perspectives on accountability among the key actors involved in implementing CAH. Overall there were three constructs that emerged from the research: ‘Divergences’, ‘Dissonances’ and ‘Disconnects’. Divergences refer to the way in which policies and programmes shift from the original conceptualization. Dissonances points to the presence of multiple perspectives on the same concept in the same organizational setting. Disconnects represents the lack of spaces within the organization that enable processes of collective sensemaking. The emergent understanding from the research is that the divergences in policy implementation may in fact reflect a deeper level of conflict at the level of belief and perspectives in different layers of the administration. In the absence of spaces and processes to facilitate collective sense-making, it is likely that policies, even when introduced with significant commitment from policymakers at the higher administrative layers, are likely to require systematic effort to sustain.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2020. p. 79
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 2071
Keywords
Community Action for Health, Community-based Accountability, Policy Implementation, Problematization, Institutional Perspective, National Rural Health Mission / National Health Mission, Tamil Nadu, India
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Research subject
Public health
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-167590 (URN)978-91-7855-204-7 (ISBN)978-91-7855-205-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-02-28, N440, Naturvetarhuset, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2020-02-07 Created: 2020-01-31 Last updated: 2020-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1218 kB)68 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1218 kBChecksum SHA-512
518b855d7093b9a64480a47759a687dc054bbd2055a57108bd1c426ee740654c7651a2d0b2a02e7b2a16e21ddb0328f7d9c4e7f59b530b95256c57adb2cb7dd6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Gaitonde, RakhalSan Sebastian, MiguelHurtig, Anna-Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gaitonde, RakhalSan Sebastian, MiguelHurtig, Anna-Karin
By organisation
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 68 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 186 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf