umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Suboptimal use of ultrasound examinations may result in underperformance of Vietnamese maternity care- A qualitative study of midwives’ experiences and views
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3391-2308
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology. Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Show others and affiliations
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Objective

To explore Vietnamese midwives’ experiences and views on the role of obstetric ultrasound in relation to clinical management, including ethical aspects.

 

Methods

Using a qualitative design, content analysis of focus group discussions with midwives (N=25) working at Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology at three hospitals in urban, semi-urban and rural parts of Hanoi were performed. 

 

Results

Obstetric ultrasound was reported as being a highly valuable tool, although replacing ordinary antenatal care surveillance with ultrasound examinations and misuse of ultrasound without medical indication was perceived as troubling. Participants generally viewed the fetus as a human being already at an early stage of pregnancy. However, when complications occurred, the pregnant woman’s health was mostly prioritized.

 

Conclusion

Although the use of ultrasound has many benefits during pregnancy, replacing ordinary antenatal care surveillance with ultrasound examinations and misuse of ultrasound without medical indication is concerning and needs to be addressed. There is also a need to communicate the benefits of adequate antenatal care to pregnant women and caution about the non-beneficial use of repeated ultrasound examinations without medical indication. Additionally, non-medical ultrasounds consume limited healthcare resources and its use needs to be better regulated in Vietnam. 

Keywords [en]
Ultrasonography Prenatal, Midwives, Vietnam, Maternal Health Services, Antenatal Care, Pregnant women
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Research subject
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-163479OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-163479DiVA, id: diva2:1353347
Funder
Västerbotten County CouncilForte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2014-2672Available from: 2019-09-23 Created: 2019-09-23 Last updated: 2019-09-24
In thesis
1. Health professionals’ experiences and views related to obstetric ultrasound in Rwanda and Vietnam
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Health professionals’ experiences and views related to obstetric ultrasound in Rwanda and Vietnam
2019 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background

Obstetric ultrasound has become an indispensable part of maternity care in high-income countries, where it is universally used for screening, diagnostic and surveillance purposes. In low-income countries, insufficient numbers of trained health professionals’ is commonly a barrier to obstetric ultrasound use. Globally, health professionals’ encounter complex clinical situations in which rapid technical improvements in fetal surveillance and pregnancy interventions are components that influence clinical decisions, thereby implicating maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Aims

The overall aim of this thesis was to explore health professionals’ experiences and views on the role of obstetric ultrasound in relation to clinical management, including ethical aspects, in two low-to-middle-income countries with different characteristics, cultures, religions and health care systems.

Methods

Study I (Rwanda) and Study III (Vietnam) are based on focus group discussions in which data were analysed using content analysis. Study I included six focus group discussions with 23 midwives recruited from six different hospitals in the area of Kigali and in the Southern province. Study III included four focus group discussions with 25 midwives working at three different hospitals in the Hanoi area. Study II (Rwanda) and Study IV (Vietnam) are cross-sectional studies using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s chi-square test and logistic regression analyses. A questionnaire, including items based on the results from previous qualitative studies, was used as the data collection tool. For Study II, health professionals (midwives, nurses, obstetricians, other physicians; N=907) working at 108 health facilities representing all provinces of Rwanda were recruited. Study IV constituted a regional sample of 824 health professionals (midwives, obstetricians/gynecologists) working at 29 health facilities in urban, semi-urban and rural parts of Hanoi, Vietnam.

Main findings

Obstetric ultrasound was regarded as a highly valued tool for pregnancy management in Rwanda as well as in Vietnam (Papers I–IV). In Rwanda, access to ultrasound was described as poor, especially for women living in rural areas (Paper I). In contrast, access to obstetric ultrasound was described as being very high in all health facilities in urban, semi-urban and rural areas of Hanoi (Paper III & Paper IV). In Rwanda, if a pregnancy was considered normal, obstetric ultrasound was not routinely performed (Paper I), while pregnant women in Vietnam were reported as undergoing several further ultrasound examinations in addition to the three examinations recommended by the Ministry of Health (Paper III). Midwives in Rwanda expressed a need to be trained in ultrasound, particularly those working at health centres in rural areas where ultrasound was rarely available (Paper I). A majority of health professionals (91%) also agreed that maternity care in Rwanda would improve if midwives were qualified to perform basic ultrasound examinations (Paper II). Sub-optimal pregnancy management due to a lack of or insufficient ultrasound training was reported by health professionals in both Rwanda (65%; Paper II) and Vietnam (37%; Paper IV). The use of obstetric ultrasound without medical indication was described as a troubling phenomenon, especially in Vietnam, where participants also reported that pregnant women sometimes replaced antenatal care surveillancewith ultrasound examinations (Paper III).

Conclusion

Obstetric ultrasound plays a significant role in pregnancy management in Rwanda, although access varies significantly. The findings indicate that physicians in Rwanda are in need of additional formal ultrasound training in order to increase the quality of ultrasound surveillance and to improve maternal and fetal health outcomes. To increase ultrasound access for all pregnant women in Rwanda, midwives could potentially be trained to perform basic ultrasound examinations. In the Hanoi area of Vietnam, ultrasound is a well-integrated tool in pregnancy management and access was high. However, overuse and commercialisation of obstetric ultrasound examinations were described as common and need to be addressed to achieve adequate allocation of resources. The rapid development of technology in maternity care needs to be accompanied by medical guidelines stating the appropriate indications for ultrasound surveillance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2019. p. 79
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 2042
Keywords
Prenatal ultrasonography, pregnancy, midwife, obstetrician, health personnel, health professional, prenatal care, epidemiology, cross-sectional study, focus group discussion, qualitative content analysis, Rwanda, Vietnam
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Research subject
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-163509 (URN)978-91-7855-087-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2019-10-18, Stora Hörsalen, 5B, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2019-09-27 Created: 2019-09-24 Last updated: 2019-09-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Holmlund, SophiaEdvardsson, KristinaGraner, SophieMogren, Ingrid

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holmlund, SophiaEdvardsson, KristinaGraner, SophieMogren, Ingrid
By organisation
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 7 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf