umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Shaking Hands: Balancing Tensions in the Swedish Forested Landscape
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7674-6197
2019 (English)In: Conservation and Society, ISSN 0972-4923, E-ISSN 0975-3133Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Wild ungulates play a key role in the management and governance of Swedish wildlife. They are primarily harvested for meat but are also important for non-consumptive uses of wildlife such as recreation. However, due to browsing and crop-raiding, ungulates also reduce the forest's economic value and make it difficult for farmers to maintain agricultural practices. While current policies and regulations clearly indicate that wildlife is to be treated as valuable, others may disagree. This setting provided an opportunity to study the search for mutually acceptable outcomes and working relationships in parallel to the state-regulated management arrangements. The shared and disputed issues in the studied case echo the broader issues of entitlement to resources and value transformation that can stabilise but also disturb or even disrupt environmental management. The diverging interests, claims, and experiences of forestry, hunting, farming, recreation, and protection, expressed in their own voices and consolidated into narratives about land, land use, and rights and obligations, can be seen as an important driver of collective action. The connections between the experiences of and the dynamics behind the decision to collaborate reveal a contested space in which the commercial wood industries, agriculture, the decentralised state, conservation, and recreational interests are all involved and must negotiate with one another to secure their interests. The participants justify their actions symbolically, referring to an idiom of rights, the construct of forestry's importance for the public good, and the desire to be resourceful and authoritative outside the framework of state action.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wolters Kluwer, 2019.
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies) Economic Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-163937DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_18_112OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-163937DiVA, id: diva2:1359280
Available from: 2019-10-08 Created: 2019-10-08 Last updated: 2019-10-09

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textURL

Authority records BETA

Sandström, Camilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, Camilla
By organisation
Department of Political Science
In the same journal
Conservation and Society
Social Sciences InterdisciplinaryPolitical Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)Economic Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf