umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Performance and inter-observer variability of prostate MRI (PI-RADS version 2) outside high-volume centres
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Scandinavian journal of urology, ISSN 2168-1805, E-ISSN 2168-1813, Vol. 53, no 5, p. 304-311Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: Despite the growing trend to embrace pre-biopsy MRI in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer (PC), its performance and inter-observer variability outside high-volume centres remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate sensitivity of and variability between readers of prostate MRI outside specialized units with radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen as the reference standard.

Materials and methods: Retrospective study comprising a consecutive cohort of all 97 men who underwent MRI and subsequent RP between January 2012 and December 2014 at a private hospital in Sweden. Three readers, blinded to clinical data, reviewed all images (including 11 extra prostate MRI to reduce bias). A tumour was considered detected if the overall PI-RADS v2 score was 3-5 and there was an approximate match (same or neighbouring sector) of tumour sector according to a 24 sector system used for both MRI and whole mount sections.

Results: Detection rate for the index tumour ranged from 67 to 76%, if PI-RADS 3-5 lesions were considered positive and 54-66% if only PI-RADS score 4-5 tumours were included. Detection rate for aggressive tumours (GS >= 4 + 3) was higher; 83.1% for PI-RADS 3-5 and 79.2% for PI-RADS 4-5. The agreement between readers showed average values of 0.41 for PI-RADS score 3-5 and 0.51 for PI-RADS score 4-5.

Conclusions: Prostate MRI evidenced a moderate detection rate for clinically significant PC with a rather large variability between readers. Clinics outside specialized units must have knowledge of their performance of prostate MRI before considering omitting biopsies in men with negative MRI.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2019. Vol. 53, no 5, p. 304-311
Keywords [en]
Prostatic neoplasms, magnetic resonance imaging, radical prostatectomy, interobserver agreement, observer variation
National Category
Urology and Nephrology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-165467DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1675757ISI: 000493146100001PubMedID: 31661357OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-165467DiVA, id: diva2:1375362
Available from: 2019-12-04 Created: 2019-12-04 Last updated: 2020-03-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1489 kB)8 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1489 kBChecksum SHA-512
2fd49437644c681c8e9c9a1e5563c665f7f104c89e21e5fe3d5775fb141f547abc4639f1cbf6ac4090f182b5af9522f97efbb62467e7ca7497b9decae310b51b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Josefsson, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Josefsson, Andreas
By organisation
Urology and AndrologyWallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine at Umeå University (WCMM)
In the same journal
Scandinavian journal of urology
Urology and Nephrology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 39 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 74 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf