umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How stakeholder representatives cope with collaboration in the Swedish moose management system
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Human Dimensions of Wildlife, ISSN 1087-1209, E-ISSN 1533-158X, Vol. 25, no 2, p. 154-170Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The collaborative ecosystem-based management of moose (Alces alces) in Sweden puts a strain on the involved stakeholders. Representatives have to cope with environmental uncertainty and social stress associated with goal conflicts. This article advanced the understanding of representatives' coping strategies in response to perceived challenges and how these coping strategies are associated with social trust, focusing upon salient value similarity. A mixed-method approach, combining a questionnaire survey (n = 624) and interviews (n = 21) among landowners and hunter representatives, was employed. Survey results showed that the presence of emotion-centered coping strategies that involve venting of negative emotions and behavioral disengagement were associated with relatively lower trust, whereas problem-solving centered coping was associated with relatively higher trust. The interviews indicated the importance of appointing group leaders who are skilled at initiating dialogue and working toward decisions and compromises, as this seemed to hinder expressions of emotion-centered coping strategies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2020. Vol. 25, no 2, p. 154-170
Keywords [en]
Coping, social trust, moose, ecosystem-based management
National Category
Political Science Fish and Wildlife Management
Research subject
political science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-165976DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2019.1698081ISI: 000513306800004OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-165976DiVA, id: diva2:1375747
Available from: 2019-12-05 Created: 2019-12-05 Last updated: 2020-03-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1813 kB)7 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1813 kBChecksum SHA-512
afc0353b7557028f2e93f8a90b8529d3987bbc50e6116582da78e83a5c4432ec700e892d2dacda59e9610195ec5e05e211bfc42b0f7a2ccff53d49301bad5c80
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Sandström, Camilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, Camilla
By organisation
Department of Political Science
In the same journal
Human Dimensions of Wildlife
Political ScienceFish and Wildlife Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 35 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 45 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf