umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implementing the Water Framework Directive and Tackling Diffuse Pollution from Agriculture: Lessons from England and Scotland
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Sociology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1400-2141
2020 (English)In: Water, ISSN 2073-4441, E-ISSN 2073-4441, Vol. 12, no 1, article id 244Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Tackling diffuse pollution from agriculture is a key challenge for governments seeking to implement the European Union’s Water Framework Directive (WFD). In the research literature, how best to integrate and align effective measures for tackling diffuse pollution, within the context of the EU’s multilevel governance structure, remains an open question. This paper focuses on the first and second implementation cycles of the WFD to explore how national governance arrangements either facilitated or hindered the adoption of effective policies, especially with regards to the delivery of agricultural and water policies on the ground. It draws on data collected through systematic document analysis and interviews with key experts, policymakers and interest groups, and presents a comparative analysis of two case studies: England and Scotland. The case studies show that Scotland’s joined-up governance structure, which enabled policymakers and interest groups to work together and to build trust and cooperation, facilitated the adoption of stricter measures for tackling diffuse pollution. In contrast, in England institutional fragmentation prevented a meaningful engagement of all parties and acted as a barrier. The analysis unpacks the design of policy mixes and the conditions that allow national governments to pursue more holistic and integrated governance approaches to overcome opposition from interest groups and gain their support.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2020. Vol. 12, no 1, article id 244
Keywords [en]
public policy, governance, WFD, Scotland, England
National Category
Public Administration Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-167415DOI: 10.3390/w12010244ISI: 000519847200244OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-167415DiVA, id: diva2:1386858
Available from: 2020-01-20 Created: 2020-01-20 Last updated: 2020-05-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(527 kB)29 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 527 kBChecksum SHA-512
694e7d5c2a1fc79246a6072b0a3d54c3eaa530db8692c5d728b9f3a14179ca99a1b2533f002d14d4bdf1d429515a19164ab262ebd53832cc467521fa6360987b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Fairbrother, Malcolm

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fairbrother, Malcolm
By organisation
Department of Sociology
In the same journal
Water
Public Administration Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 29 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 80 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf