umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Elder abuse through a prism of perceptions: perspectives of potential witnesses
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Omvårdnad.
2007 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis was to deepen understanding of elder abuse (EA) by exploring and comparing perceptions held by experts, older persons, representatives of potential support organizations, and family members. Experts’ perspectives (I) were examined through risk indicators and screening questions (a) located in EA literature and (b) selected by an international Delphi panel. Risk indicators most commonly found in the literature or selected by the panel were compiled into consensus lists. There were differences between risk indicators and questions in the two lists. In papers II and III participants were interviewed in focus groups about their perceptions of EA. Older persons (II) considered EA to be due to changing society and family systems where children are not brought up to respect older persons. EA was mainly conceptualized as ageism, criminal actions, mistreatment in residential care, and societal abuse. The abuser was perceived as a stranger or a healthcare worker. Fear was discussed as a major consequence of EA; especially fear among women. Abused persons were described as carrying the responsibility to seek help. Witnesses were described as hesitant to get involved. Improvements in society such as educating children and healthcare workers were considered ways to cope with EA. Besides family and friends there were few spontaneous suggestions for where to seek help and support in society. These suggestions included healthcare, police, church, and volunteer organizations. Representatives of these suggested organizations were interviewed in focus groups about their perceptions of EA (III). Perceptions of both causes and conceptions of EA were very similar to perceptions of older persons (II). Four themes emerged in the data; good intentions in abusive situations, older generation’s responsibility for EA, failing to report abuse, and prevention of abuse. Participants (III) also expressed ageist attitudes themselves and findings included victim blaming and tolerance for EA. Participants perceived that anyone could be provoked to abuse, and that abusers can be considered victims in abusive situations. Confidentiality was discussed as a barrier to reporting and the need for educating children to show respect for older persons was identified. Interviews with an adult family member (IV) explored her experiences of witnessing abuse situations between her uncle and his wife. In her desire to protect and remain loyal to her family she felt powerless and tolerated abuse. She longed for support she could trust but was locked into passivity by her feelings of shame. Synthesis of findings (I – IV) revealed issues of isolation, autonomy, vulnerability, victim blaming, perceiving the abuser as a victim of circumstances, ageism, tolerating EA, shame, and power as essential elements in EA. Based on the findings, alternative descriptions of EA are offered as a challenge to existing EA definitions. Findings suggest that a key to unlocking EA is compassion, understood as the ability to see a situation as if we were in it ourselves, experiencing the potential for disrespect, shame and unworthiness inherent in abusive acts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Omvårdnad , 2007. , 72 p.
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 1109
Keyword [en]
elder abuse, Delphi technique, focus groups, narrative analysis, risk indicators, ageism, victim blaming, shame, power, compassion
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1392ISBN: 978-91-7264-364-2 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-1392DiVA: diva2:140861
Public defence
2007-11-01, Aulan, Vårdvetarhuset, Umeå Universtiy, Umeå, Sweden, 09:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2007-10-12 Created: 2007-10-12Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Elder abuse risk indicators and screening questions: results from a literature search and a panel of experts from developed and developing countries
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Elder abuse risk indicators and screening questions: results from a literature search and a panel of experts from developed and developing countries
2005 (English)In: Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, ISSN 0894-6566, E-ISSN 1540-4129, Vol. 15, no 3/4, 185-203 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-2634 (URN)10.1300/J084v15n03_11 (DOI)
Available from: 2007-10-12 Created: 2007-10-12 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved
2. Perceptions of elder abuse in Sweden: voices of older persons
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Perceptions of elder abuse in Sweden: voices of older persons
2005 (English)In: Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, ISSN 1474-3310, E-ISSN 1474-3329, Vol. 5, no 2, 213-227 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-2635 (URN)10.1093/brief-treatment/mhi017 (DOI)
Available from: 2007-10-12 Created: 2007-10-12 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved
3. Perceptions of elder abuse: voices of professionals and volunteers in Sweden: an exploratory study
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Perceptions of elder abuse: voices of professionals and volunteers in Sweden: an exploratory study
2006 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, ISSN 0283-9318, E-ISSN 1471-6712, Vol. 20, no 2, 151-159 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-2636 (URN)10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00392.x (DOI)
Available from: 2007-10-12 Created: 2007-10-12 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved
4. The secret shame of witnessing elder abuse in the family
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The secret shame of witnessing elder abuse in the family
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-2637 (URN)
Available from: 2007-10-12 Created: 2007-10-12 Last updated: 2012-06-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1026 kB)1854 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1026 kBChecksum SHA-1
885bbe59106ce6f84711a414a7378cf59e5541f3881de658adf34cfae2c2e98525eca62a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1854 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 2310 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf