umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The PLUSS Approach: Domain Modeling with Features, Use Cases and Use Case Realizations
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Computing Science.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Computing Science.
2005 (English)In: Proceedings of the 9'th International Conference on Software Product Lines (SPLC'05), LNCS, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin , 2005, p. 33-44Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This paper describes a product line use case modeling approach tailored towards organizations developing and maintaining extremely long lived software intensive systems. We refer to the approach as the PLUSS approach, Product Line Use case modeling for Systems and Software engineering . An industrial case study is presented where PLUSS is applied and evaluated in the target domain. Based on the case study data we draw the conclusion that PLUSS performs better than modeling according to the styles and guidelines specified by the IBM-Rational Unified Process (RUP) in the current industrial context.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Heidelberg: Springer Berlin , 2005. p. 33-44
Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ISSN 0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-2811DOI: 10.1007/11554844_5ISBN: 978-3-540-28936-4 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-2811DiVA, id: diva2:141093
Available from: 2007-11-22 Created: 2007-11-22 Last updated: 2018-06-09Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Engineering Families of Software-Intensive Systems using Features, Goals and Scenarios
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Engineering Families of Software-Intensive Systems using Features, Goals and Scenarios
2007 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Over the last decade, software has become an integral part of many products with which it is not traditionally associated (e.g., automobiles, medical equipment, home appliances, etc.). This has led to problems in many organizations, since it has proved difficult to integrate software engineering processes with other engineering processes. To address the increased complexity and to coordinate their engineering efforts, many organizations working in such domains have therefore introduced systems engineering into their business processes.

Systems engineering is an interdisciplinary approach to system development. Teamwork is essential in developing complex systems, and systems engineering orchestrates this process throughout the lifespan of a system. The focus of systems engineering is on defining customer needs and required functionality, documenting requirements, synthesizing a design and validating the system. A problem with the traditional techniques of systems engineering is, however, that they provide inadequate support for achieving high levels of reuse between different projects.

In this dissertation, methods and tools with the overall purpose of providing an improved reuse infrastructure for systems engineering artifacts and their resulting detailed design artifacts are proposed. The proposed methods and tools are based on the software product-line approach, a reuse strategy which focuses on families of related systems that address particular market segments.

Studies have shown that if an empirical study does not report experiences from that which practitioners consider a “real” situation, results are likely to be ignored. Even though case studies cannot achieve the scientific rigor of formal experiments, case studies can provide enough information to decide if a specific technology will benefit a particular organization. To ensure industry-relevant research results, case studies on real development projects were chosen as the main vehicle for performing research.

This dissertation reports experiences from four empirical studies which were performed within the Swedish defense industry. The studies indicate that the proposed methods and tools indeed provide an improved reuse infrastructure, compared to the previously used methods and tools.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Datavetenskap, 2007. p. 35
Series
Report / UMINF, ISSN 0348-0542 ; 07.24
Keywords
systems engineering, software product lines, requirements engineering, variability management, use case modeling, feature modeling
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1447 (URN)978-91-7264-440-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2007-12-14, MA121, MIT-huset, Umeå univeritet, Umeå, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2007-11-22 Created: 2007-11-22 Last updated: 2018-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Börstler, Jürgen

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Börstler, Jürgen
By organisation
Department of Computing Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 69 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf