umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Use of questionnaires and an expert panel as a method to judge the environmental consequences of chemical spills for the development of an environment-accident index
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social and Economic Geography.
2005 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN 0301-4797, E-ISSN 1095-8630, Vol. 75, no 3, 247-261 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Assessing the environmental consequences of a chemical accident is a complex task. To date, the methods used to evaluate the environmental effects of an acute release of a chemical have often been based on measurements of chemical and physical variables deemed to be important, such as the concentration of the chemical. However, a broader strategy is needed to predict the environmental consequences of potential accidents during the planning process. An Environment-Accident Index (EAI), a simple tool based on such a strategy, has been developed to facilitate the consideration of a multitude of influential variables. The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether questionnaire-based expert panel's judgements could provide useful data on the environmental consequences of chemical spills, and an effective basis for further development of the EAI. As expected, the judgements did not agree perfectly, but they do give rough indications of the environmental effects, and highlight consistent trends that should be useful inputs for planning, prevention and decontamination processes. The different accidents were also judged to have caused everything from minor to very major effects in the environment, implying that a wide range of accident scenarios were represented in the material and covered by the EAL Therefore, questionnaires and expert panel judgements can be used to collect useful data for estimating the likely environmental consequences of chemical accidents and for further development of the EAI.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Academic Press, 2005. Vol. 75, no 3, 247-261 p.
Keyword [en]
EAI, questionnaire, expert panel, chemical accidents, environmental effects
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-3328DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.002ISI: 000228848100006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-3328DiVA: diva2:141968
Available from: 2004-01-08 Created: 2004-01-08 Last updated: 2017-06-21Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Development of an Environment-Accident Index: A planning tool to protect the environment in case of a chemical spill
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Development of an Environment-Accident Index: A planning tool to protect the environment in case of a chemical spill
2004 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Utveckling av Miljöolycksindex : Ett planeringsverktyg för att skydda miljön i händelse av kemikalieolycka
Abstract [en]

The increasing mass and complexity of chemicals being produced and transported has resulted in more rigorous demands on both authorities as well as chemical-handling industries to assess the risks involved. The Environment-Accident Index (EAI), has been proposed as a planning tool created as an equation in which chemical properties (variables describing the chemical involved) are combined with site-specific properties (variables describing the accident site). The EAI is intended to facilitate assessment of the environmental effects related to chemical accident scenarios and hence assist the organisation of preventative programs. The main objective of the work described in this thesis was to evaluate, develop and improve the proposed EAI. The steps involved in the development process included I) evaluation of the feasibility of the EAI approach, II) selection of a representative and diverse set of chemical accidents to be used in the development III) the use of questionnaires and expert judgements to develop response values for environmental effects of a chemical accident, and IV) to create a new EAI model using multivariate modelling (PLS). The EAI approach proved to be useful in the work to protect the environment in case of a chemical accident. A representative set of accidents was selected by means of statistical multivariate design (PCA) based on assembled data related to a set of 55 chemical accidents. The selection generated a set of accidents representing a diverse spectrum of chemical accident scenarios. To develop a measure of environmental effects of the chemical accidents i.e. responses, an expert panel was asked to judge their environmental effects (such as effects on animal life in the aquatic or terrestrial environment). The results showed that the judgements give a rough estimate of environmental effects that could be used as responses in the development of the EAI. The developed responses were then related to the chemical and site-specific properties to create a new EAI model. This resulted in a PLS-based EAI connected to a new classification scale. The advantages of the new EAI are that it can be calculated without the use of tables; it can estimate the effects for all included responses, and make a rough classification of chemical accidents according to the new classification scale. Finally, the new EAI is a more stable model than the previously proposed EAI, and it is founded on a valid base of accident scenarios, making its use for a variety of chemicals and situations more reliable since it covers a broader spectrum of accident scenarios. The new EAI can be expressed as a regression model to facilitate calculation of the index for people that do not have access to PLS. The highest priorities for further refining the new EAI in the future are: external validation of the EAI; further refinement of the formula’s structure; adjustment of the new classification scale; and real-life evaluation of the EAI.

Publisher
106 p.
Keyword
Environmental chemistry, Environment-Accident Index, Chemical Accidents, environmental effects, questionnaire, expert judgements, statistical multivariate design, PCA, PLS, Miljökemi
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-178 (URN)91-7305-577-8 (ISBN)
Public defence
2004-01-30, KB3B1, KBC, 901 87, Umeå, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2004-01-08 Created: 2004-01-08 Last updated: 2009-12-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Scott, ÅsaStjernström, Olof
By organisation
Department of ChemistryDepartment of Social and Economic Geography
In the same journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 45 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf