umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Documenting child welfare investigations: A comparative study of uniformity and variation in Canadian and Swedish assessment summaries
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Social Welfare.
Article in journal (Refereed) Submitted
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-3662OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-3662DiVA: diva2:142465
Available from: 2004-02-05 Created: 2004-02-05Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Protecting Our Children: A comparative study of the dynamics of structure, intervention and their interplay in Swedish child welfare and Canadian child protection
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Protecting Our Children: A comparative study of the dynamics of structure, intervention and their interplay in Swedish child welfare and Canadian child protection
2004 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This dissertation is a case study of how two agencies in Umeå, Sweden and Barrie, Canada protect children found in need of child welfare services. The project's purposes are to describe how children are protected from harm in these two contexts, to illuminate the similarities and differences in the child welfare systems reflected at the local level, and explicate the significance of uncovered similarities and differences. The research project is grounded in three complementary theoretical approaches: i) social constructionism, ii) critical program evaluation theory, and iii) institutional ethnography. Using a model I developed to guide cross-national comaprisons, the research project explores three dimensions in the organization and delivery of services: i)Structure (service contexts and features), ii) Intervention (intervention process, and documentation and gatekeeping as two central aspects of intervention), and iii) the interplay between structure and intervention. The project combines methods including focus groups, qualitative application of the vignette technique, and analyses of assessment summaries extracted from case files at each agency. Finding from this investgation are reported in four papers. We identified differences in gatekeeping, use of social work skills, identification of clients, decision-making, and use of compulsory measures and the availability of other measures for clients. The documentation study showed that in Canada documentation is increasingly structured whereas in Sweden documentation is systematically varied but with narrative forms dominating. The different documentation trajectories in these nations are coupled to the paths they have taken with regard to the care and protection of children. We then focus on the "best interests of the child" principle. In Canada, the best interests principle is paramount but intimately connected to "need of protection" and risk assessment. In Sweden, the best interests principle is contibutory to the Social Service Act's emphasis on a solidaristic response to need. When data from this study are taken in context with other research in the field, it appears to give meaning to description of two models of state service for children in need because of abuse or neglect. Umeå is representative of some of the key elements in Swedish child welfare whereas Barrie is representative of some of the key elements in Canadian child protection.

Publisher
200 p.
Series
Studier i socialt arbete vid Umeå universitet : avhandlings- och skriftserie, ISSN 0283-300X ; 39
Keyword
Social service, child welfare, child protection, social services, comparative, cross-national, social work, Socialt arbete
National Category
Social Work
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-193 (URN)91-7305-579-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2004-01-30, Hörsal E, Humanisthuset, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 10:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2004-02-05 Created: 2004-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Social Welfare

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 54 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf