Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Yeast DNA polymerase epsilon participates in leading-strand DNA replication.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Biochemistry and Biophsyics.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Biochemistry and Biophsyics.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Biochemistry and Biophsyics.
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: Science, ISSN 1095-9203, Vol. 317, no 5834, 127-130 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 317, no 5834, 127-130 p.
Keyword [en]
Base Pair Mismatch, DNA Polymerase II/genetics/*metabolism, DNA Replication, DNA; Fungal/metabolism, Fungal Proteins/genetics, Mutation, Point Mutation, Replication Origin, Saccharomyces cerevisiae/*enzymology/genetics
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-6349DOI: 10.1126/science.1144067PubMedID: 17615360OAI: diva2:146018
Available from: 2007-12-09 Created: 2007-12-09Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Role of yeast DNA polymerase epsilon during DNA replication
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Role of yeast DNA polymerase epsilon during DNA replication
2008 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Each cell division, the nuclear DNA must be replicated efficiently and with high accuracy to avoid mutations which can have an effect on cell function. There are three replicative DNA polymerases essential for the synthesis of DNA during replication in eukaryotic cells. DNA polymerase α (Pol α) synthesize short primers required for DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) and DNA polymerase ε (Pol ε) to carry out the bulk synthesis. The role of Pol δ and Pol ε at the replication fork has been unclear. The aim of this thesis was to examine what role Pol ε has at the replication fork, compare the biochemical properties of Pol δ and Pol ε, and to study the function of the second largest and essential subunit of Pol ε, Dpb2.

To identify where Pol ε replicates DNA in vivo, a strategy was taken where the active site of Pol ε was altered to create a mutator polymerase leaving a unique error-signature. A series of mutant pol ε proteins were purified and analyzed for enzyme activity and fidelity of DNA synthesis. Two mutants, M644F and M644G, exhibited an increased mutation rate and close to normal polymerase activity. One of these, the M644G gave rise to a specific increase of mismatch mutations resulting from T-dTMP mis-pairing during DNA synthesis in vitro. The M644G mutant was introduced in yeast strains carrying a reporter gene, URA3, on either side of an origin in different orientations. Mutations which inactivated the URA3 gene in the M644G mutant strains were analyzed. A strand specific signature was found demonstrating that Pol ε participates in the synthesis of the leading strand.

Pol δ and Pol ε are both stimulated by the processivity clamp, PCNA, in in vitro replication assays. To clarify any differences they were challenged side by side in biochemical assays. Pol ε was found to require that single-stranded template (ssDNA) was entirely coated with RPA, whereas Pol δ was much less sensitive to uncoated ssDNA. The processivity of Pol δ was stimulated to a much higher degree by PCNA than of Pol ε. In presence of PCNA the processivity of Pol δ and Pol ε was comparable. In contrast, Pol ε was approximately four times slower than Pol δ when replicating a single-primed circular template in the presence of all accessory proteins and an excess of polymerase. The biochemical characterization of the system suggests that Pol ε and Pol δ are loaded onto the PCNA-primer-ternary complex by separate mechanisms. A model is proposed where the loading of Pol ε onto the leading strand is independent of the PCNA interaction motif which is required by enzymes acting on the lagging strand.

The essential gene DPB2 encodes for the second largest subunit of Pol ε. We carried out a genetic screen in S.cerevisiae and isolated a lethal mutant allele of dpb2 (dpb2-200). When over-expressed together with the remaining three subunits of Polε, Pol2, Dpb3 and Dpb4, the dpb2-201 did not copurify. The biochemical property of Pol2/Dpb3/Dpb4 complex was compared with wild-type four-subunit Pol ε (Pol2/Dpb2/Dpb3/Dpb4) and a Pol2/Dpb2 complex in replication assays. The absence of Dpb2 in the complex did not significantly affect the specific activity or the processivity, but gave a slightly reduced efficiency in holoenzyme assays when compared to wild-type four-subunit Pol ε. We propose that Dpb2 is not essential for the enzyme activity of Pol ε.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Medicinsk kemi och biofysik, 2008. 43 p.
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 1231
DNA polymerase epsilon, eukaryotic DNA replication, fidelity, leading strand, Dpb2
National Category
Medical Bioscience
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1932 (URN)978-91-7264-699-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2008-12-11, KB3A9, KBC, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 09:00 (English)
Available from: 2008-11-24 Created: 2008-11-24 Last updated: 2009-04-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Isoz, IsabelleLundström, Else-BrittJohansson, Erik
By organisation
Medical Biochemistry and Biophsyics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 70 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link