umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
GCxGC-ECD a promising method for the determination of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in food and feed
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Chemistry.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Chemistry.
Show others and affiliations
2008 (English)In: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, ISSN 1618-2642 (Print) 1618-2650 (Online), Vol. 390, no 7, 1815-27 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is a need for cost-efficient alternatives to gas chromatography (GC)–high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) for the analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in food and feed. Comprehensive two-dimensional GC–micro electron capture detection (GC×GC-μECD) was tested and all relevant (according to the World Health Organisation, WHO) PCDD/Fs and PCBs could be separated when using a DB-XLB/LC-50 column combination. Validation tests by two laboratories showed that detectability, repeatability, reproducibility and accuracy of GC×GC-μECD are all statistically consistent with GC-HRMS results. A limit of detection of 0.5 pg WHO PCDD/F tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin equivalency concentration per gram of fish oil was established. The reproducibility was less than 10%, which is below the recommended EU value for reference methods (less than 15%). Injections of vegetable oil extracts spiked with PCBs, polychlorinated naphthalenes and diphenyl ethers at concentrations of 200 ng/g showed no significant impact on the dioxin results, confirming in that way the robustness of the method. The use of GC×GC-μECD as a routine method for food and feed analysis is therefore recommended. However, the data evaluation of low dioxin concentrations is still laborious owing to the need for manual integration. This makes the overall analysis costs higher than those of GC-HRMS. Further developments of software are needed (and expected) to reduce the data evaluation time. Combination of the current method with pressurised liquid extraction with in-cell cleanup will result in further reduction of analysis costs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 390, no 7, 1815-27 p.
Keyword [en]
Analysis, Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography, Electron capture detection, Polychlorinated biphenyls, Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, Food and feed
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-8791DOI: doi:10.1007/s00216-008-1896-0PubMedID: 18256808OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-8791DiVA: diva2:148462
Available from: 2008-03-27 Created: 2008-03-27 Last updated: 2010-02-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Haglund, PeterDanielsson, ConnyWiberg, Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Haglund, PeterDanielsson, ConnyWiberg, Karin
By organisation
Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 150 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf