umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Microclimatic buffering by logging residues and forest edges reduces clear-cutting impacts on forest bryophytes
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.
2008 (English)In: Applied Vegetation Science, ISSN 1402-2001, E-ISSN 1654-109X, Vol. 11, no 3, 345-354 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Question: The practice of extracting logging residues after clear-cutting for bioenergy purposes is spreading. Logging residues constitute a shelter in clear-cut areas and therefore concerns have been expressed that their removal could make the ground and its vegetation more exposed to extreme micro¬climatic conditions. We asked whether logging residues and forest edges can protect ground-dwelling forest bryophytes from fatal microclimate events following clear-cutting.

Location: Boreal forests of central Sweden.

Methods: Using transplants of eight forest floor bryophyte species we experimentally analysed the sheltering effect (less solar radiation and less wind) of logging residues and forest edges in seven clear-cut areas. Transplants were placed in two contrasting positions in each area; near a north-facing forest edge and in the centre of the clear-cut area. In each position, half of the transplants were covered by a layer of spruce branches and the other half was left uncovered. We estimated proportion of apparently living shoots (apparent vitality) and measured radial growth of transplants during one growing season.

Results: Position in the clear-cut area, but not cover of spruce branches, clearly influenced radial growth. Vitality scores were higher among transplants covered with branches and the lowest apparent vitality was observed in uncovered transplants in the middle of clear-cut areas. The change in area of apparently liv¬ing shoots during the course of the experiment (growth minus mortality) was unaffected by branch cover close to the edge but positively affected in the centre of the clear-cut area. In general, the effect of branch cover on bryophytes was higher in the centre of clear-cut areas. Here, climatic measurements showed that branch cover buffers during periods of extreme microclimates.

Conclusions: Extraction of logging residues after clear-felling may reduce the survival of some ground-dwelling forest organisms. The additional sheltering provided by branches was unimportant close to forest edges. We suggest smaller clear-cut areas, green-tree retention and other ways to make logged areas shadier and less windy to mitigate the reduced shelter caused by harvest of logging residues.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 11, no 3, 345-354 p.
Keyword [en]
disturbance, edge effect, habitat quality, liver-wort, logging residue, picea abies, slash
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-11441DOI: 10.3170/2008-7-18457ISI: 000263168800007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-11441DiVA: diva2:151112
Available from: 2009-01-08 Created: 2009-01-08 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Dynesius et al_AVS2008(898 kB)103 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 898 kBChecksum SHA-512
ab312c57e8fa6db8a0c8ea139bc40fc004f2baf85cbff43043221ad8658d9e56f90531d6da8164879056fdda17fde3cec669504c92be3d94f1661bc4ce7b8a37
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dynesius, MatsÅström, MarcusNilsson, Christer
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Applied Vegetation Science
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 103 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 109 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf