Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Strong holism, weak holism, and health.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Integrative Medical Biology, Histology and Cell Biology.
2004 (English)In: Med Health Care Philos, ISSN 1386-7423, Vol. 7, no 2, 143-8; discussion 149 p.Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

The health theories of Nordenfelt and Boorse are compared. Critical attention is focused on Nordenfelt's description of his theory as one of holistic welfare, contrasting with Boorse's analytical and statistical approach. Neither theory is found to give an entirely satisfactory account of 'health' in scientific medicine or common usage. Because Nordenfelt attenuates the ontological significance of organs and organ parts and simplifies the role of statistics, his theory is regarded as weakly holistic. Boorse underrates the importance of non-statistical evaluation. A mediating position, termed 'strong holism' is suggested as a way of integrating normative and statistical elements in a more adequate health concept.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 7, no 2, 143-8; discussion 149 p.
Keyword [en]
Health, Holistic Health, Humans, Philosophy; Medical
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-12227PubMedID: 15379189OAI: diva2:151898
Available from: 2007-04-20 Created: 2007-04-20 Last updated: 2011-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links


Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Täljedal, Inge-Bert
By organisation
Histology and Cell Biology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 38 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link