umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gender differences in chemosensory perception and event-related potentials
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Psychology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Psychology.
2004 (English)In: CHEMICAL SENSES, ISSN 0379-864X, Vol. 29, no 7, 629-637 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 29, no 7, 629-637 p.
Keyword [en]
intensity, irritation, olfaction, sex, trigeminal, unpleasantness
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-13839OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-13839DiVA: diva2:153510
Available from: 2007-05-16 Created: 2007-05-16 Last updated: 2011-01-12Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Gender differences in chemosensory function
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Gender differences in chemosensory function
2005 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis consists of two studies, in which gender differences in nasal chemosensory function are investigated. The first study assesses odor identification ability in a populationbased sample, varying from 45 to 90 yrs, screened for cognitive impairment and severe olfactory dysfunction. Results show that women are generally better than men at identifying odors, but there is no significant interaction of gender by age. Although odoridentification is influenced by semantic memory and cognitive speed, these cognitivefactors are unlikely to cause the observed gender difference in odor identification. The second study investigates chemosensory perception in men and women by assessing eventrelatedbrain potentials, and perceptual ratings for an odorant, which varies inconcentration and olfactory/irritating properties. The results display a generally larger cortical response in women than in men, beginning from about 350 ms after stimulus onset. Women report higher perceived intensity and npleasantness at the highest stimulus concentration, and a steeper psychophysical function, than do men. The results indicatethat stronger cortical responses of nasal chemosensory stimuli provide a neural basis for stronger supra-threshold perception in women than in men, which might enhance odor identification performance. The nature and causes of these gender-differences in nasal chemosensory function are discussed.

This thesis for the licenciate degree is based on the following studies:Larsson, M., Nilsson, L-G., Olofsson, J.K., & Nordin, S. (2004). Demographic and cognitive predictors of odor identification: Evidence from a population-based study.Chemical Senses, 29, 547-554.Olofsson, J.K., & Nordin, S. (2004). Gender differences in chemosensory perception andevent-related potentials. Chemical Senses, 29, 629-637.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Institutionen för psykologi, 2005. 29 p.
Series
Umeå Psychology Supplement Reports, ISSN 1653-7688 ; 8
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-22533 (URN)
Distributor:
Institutionen för psykologi, 90187, Umeå
Presentation
Bt 104, Beteendevetarhuset, Umeå universitet, Umeå (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2009-05-13 Created: 2009-05-12 Last updated: 2011-01-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordin, Steven
By organisation
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf