umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Explaining the Resolution of the China-Vietnam Conflict: How Relevant is Zartman’s “Ripeness Theory”?
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Political Science.
2004 (English)In: Asian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 12, no 2, 109-125 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 12, no 2, 109-125 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-15100OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-15100DiVA: diva2:154772
Available from: 2007-06-26 Created: 2007-06-26 Last updated: 2011-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Amer, Ramses

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Amer, Ramses
By organisation
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 75 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf