umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Proteomic comparison of prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP-FGC and LNCaP-r reveals heatshock protein 60 as a marker for prostate malignancy.
Show others and affiliations
2006 (English)In: Prostate, ISSN 0270-4137, Vol. 66, no 12, 1235-44 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 66, no 12, 1235-44 p.
Keyword [en]
Blotting; Western, Cell Line; Tumor, Cell Transformation; Neoplastic/genetics/*metabolism/pathology, Chaperonin 60/genetics/*metabolism, Electrophoresis; Gel; Two-Dimensional, Epithelial Cells/metabolism/pathology, Gene Expression Regulation; Neoplastic, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Mass Spectrometry, Prognosis, Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis/genetics/*metabolism/pathology, Proteomics, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Tumor Markers; Biological/genetics/*metabolism
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-15338PubMedID: 16705742OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-15338DiVA: diva2:155010
Available from: 2008-01-11 Created: 2008-01-11 Last updated: 2011-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

PubMedhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=16705742&dopt=Citation

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bergh, Anders
By organisation
Pathology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf