umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
New aspects of septal function by using 1-dimensional strain and strain rate imaging.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Clinical Physiology.
(Kardiologi)
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Clinical Physiology.
(Kardiologi)
2006 (English)In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, ISSN 0894-7317, E-ISSN 1097-6795, Vol. 19, no 11, 1345-1349 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The interventricular septum is a complex structure, both anatomically and functionally, which limits the use of Doppler tissue imaging in the assessment of radial septal function. In this study we investigated whether strain (epsilon) and epsilon rate (SR) imaging can improve the measurement of the septal function. METHODS: Thirty healthy participants (18 women; age 60 +/- 11 years, range 42-72) were randomly selected from the population. Systolic epsilon and SR measurements were made of the radial motion from right endocardial layer (RE), left endocardial layer (LE), and middle layer of septum. Furthermore, we also compared RE and longitudinal right ventricular free wall and left ventricular longitudinal and LE septal motion. RESULTS: In both the endocardial sampling sites, LE and RE, we found negative radial epsilon (myocardial shortening), -20.1 +/- 11.5% for RE and -25.0 +/- 14.1% for LE during systole. However, in the middle layer we found a positive radial epsilon (myocardial lengthening), +11.5 +/- 13.2%, significantly different from the two endocardial layers (P < .001 for both). SR was negative in the two endocardial layers and significantly higher for LE, (-2.9 +/- 1.8 1/s) than for RE (-1.2 +/- 1.8 1/s, P < .001) and positive for the middle layer (+1.1 +/- 1.0 1/s), significantly different in comparison with the two endocardial layers (P < .001). Finally, there was a higher longitudinal epsilon compared with radial endocardial epsilon for right ventricle (-26.5 +/- 11.5 vs -20.1 +/- 11.5, P < .05) whereas there was significantly higher left ventricular radial epsilon and SR compared with the longitudinal epsilon and SR (-25.0 +/- 14.1 vs -16.8 +/- 9.5, P < .05; and -2.9 +/- 1.8 vs -1.1 +/- 0.4, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Systolic epsilon and SR imaging indicate differences in the radial deformation in different layers of the interventricular septum, which might be explained by the complexity of the septal fiber arrays and function. It might also explain why using Doppler tissue imaging technique is limited in assessing radial myocardial septal velocities. Furthermore, these results suggest that longitudinal shortening dominates in the right ventricle whereas the radial shortening dominates in the left ventricle.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 19, no 11, 1345-1349 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-16134DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.05.002PubMedID: 17098137OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-16134DiVA: diva2:155807
Available from: 2007-08-17 Created: 2007-08-17 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karp, KjellWaldenström, Anders
By organisation
Clinical Physiology
In the same journal
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 73 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf