Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Odontology, Dental Hygiene.
2004 (English)In: American Journal of Dentistry, ISSN 0894-8275, Vol. 17, no 1, 27-82 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To investigate the durability of three simplified systems in Class V non-carious abrasion/erosion lesions. METHODS: 144 non-carious cervical dentin lesions were restored either with Clearfil Liner Bond 2, a 2-step self-etching primer (n = 46), One Coat Bond, a one bottle total-etch system applied with one coat (n = 46), or Prompt-L-Pop, a 1-step self-etching primer ("all-in-one") (n = 52), in 90 individuals. Ninety-eight of the lesions showed sclerotic dentin and 46 were non-sclerotic. Sixty-one were slightly roughened with a diamond bur before conditioning. The restorations were evaluated every 6 months during a 2-year period with slightly modified USPHS criteria. RESULTS: All except three restorations were evaluated over 2 years. The cumulative loss rates for Clearfil Liner Bond 2, One Coat Bond and Prompt-L-Pop were at 6 months: 4.3, 2.2 and 3.9%, at 18 months: 4.3, 10.9 and 15.4% and at 24 months: 8.7, 13.0 and 21.2%, respectively. The cumulative loss rates of the materials in sclerotic lesions (15.7%) versus non-sclerotic lesions (14.0%) were not significanty different. Restorations placed with a diamond bur-roughened lesions showed a loss rate of 14.5%, while for the non-roughened lesions the frequency was 14.8%.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 17, no 1, 27-82 p.
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-17139PubMedID: 15241906OAI: diva2:156812
Available from: 2007-11-02 Created: 2007-11-02 Last updated: 2009-10-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text


Search in DiVA

By author/editor
van Dijken, Jan
By organisation
Dental Hygiene
In the same journal
American Journal of Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 26 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link