umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Odontology, Dental Hygiene.
Show others and affiliations
2005 (English)In: Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6357, E-ISSN 1502-3850, Vol. 63, no 3, 173-178 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE. In this intra-individual comparison (an 18-months' randomized, controlled prospective study), we evaluated the clinical performance of one self-etch and one "etch & rinse" adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. METHODS. Twenty-five patients with at least two pairs of similar-sized non-carious cervical lesions participated. Seventy-eight restorations were placed; 39 with etch & rinse (Single-Bond) and 39 with self-etch (Adper Prompt). Both adhesives were combined with the microfilled resin composite Filtek-A110. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months according to slightly modified USPHS criteria. Statistical differences between the adhesives was tested with McNemar's test and clinical degradation over time for each material with the Fisher exact test (a=0.05). RESULTS. Thirty pairs were evaluated at 12 and 18 months. Two self-etch restorations were lost after 18 months. Nine Adper Prompt and four Single-Bond restorations scored bravo for marginal adaptation at 18 months (p<0.05). Nine Adper Prompt and three Single-Bond restorations scored bravo for marginal discoloration (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS. Both adhesive systems showed acceptable clinical retention rates according to the ADA full acceptance criteria for enamel-bonding systems in class V non-carious lesions. The self-etch adhesive showed a faster progressive marginal degradation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 63, no 3, 173-178 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-17177DOI: 10.1080/00016350510019874PubMedID: 16191912OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-17177DiVA: diva2:156850
Available from: 2007-11-06 Created: 2007-11-06 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
van Dijken, Jan
By organisation
Dental Hygiene
In the same journal
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf