umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Oxidized titanium implants in reconstructive jaw surgery.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Odontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
2005 (English)In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Vol. 7, no Suppl 1, 83-7 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation with implant-supported bridges in patients with insufficient bone volumes may require bone reconstructive procedures in conjunction with or prior to implant placement. Clinical follow-up studies using turned titanium and bone grafts have demonstrated higher failure rates than when used in nongrafted patients. Improved bone integration has been demonstrated for oxidized titanium implants; however, their clinical performance in bone reconstruction situations is not known. PURPOSE: This study was performed to analyze the survival and stability of oxidized titanium implants placed in patients subjected to reconstructive jaw surgery at one clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred oxidized titanium implants (Mk III, TiUnite, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) were placed in 47 patients in conjunction with or secondary to six different reconstructive procedures owing to insufficient bone volume. In all six groups, implant stability was assessed by resonance frequency analysis and manually checked for rotation stability at implant insertion, at the time of abutment connection, and after a minimum of 12 months of loading of the prosthetic construction. Periapical radiographs were taken after a minimum of 12 months of loading (mean 21 months) for evaluation of the marginal bone levels. The mean clinical follow-up period was 30 months. RESULTS: Of the 200 implants, 199 were considered osseointegrated at the time of abutment surgery. At the 12-month postloading follow-up, another two implants were considered not stable. Three implants (1.5%) were ranked as unsuccessful. CONCLUSION: Clinical experience with 200 consecutive oxidized implants in various reconstruction situations shows a successful outcome, with only three failures (1.5%) during a mean follow-up period of 30 months.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 7, no Suppl 1, 83-7 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-17708PubMedID: 16137092OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-17708DiVA: diva2:157381
Available from: 2007-11-16 Created: 2007-11-16 Last updated: 2011-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

PubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundgren, Stefan
By organisation
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 42 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf