Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it
Queen’s University Management School, Queen’s University Belfast, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8874-1385
2010 (English)In: Business Strategy and the Environment, ISSN 0964-4733, E-ISSN 1099-0836, Vol. 19, no 4, p. 217-229Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The mainstream of the literature on corporate sustainability follows the win–win paradigm, according to which economic, environmental and social sustainability aspects can be achieved simultaneously; indeed, corporate sustainability has often been defined by the intersection of these three areas. However, given the multi-faceted and complex nature of sustainable development, we argue that trade-offs and conflicts in corporate sustainability are the rule rather than the exception. Turning a blind eye to trade-offs thus results in a limited perspective on corporate contributions to sustainable development. In order to overcome this situation, we propose an initial framework for the analysis of trade-offs in corporate sustainability. By doing so, we pursue two aims. First, the framework serves as a starting point for a more systematic analysis of trade-offs in corporate sustainability, as it identifies different levels and dimensions to characterize such trade-offs. Second, it serves to contextualize the contributions to this special issue on trade-offs in corporate sustainability. Based on the framework, we finally point to some promising avenues for future research on trade-offs in, and a more inclusive notion of, corporate sustainability. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Vol. 19, no 4, p. 217-229
Keywords [en]
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management, Geography, Planning and Development, Business and International Management, trade-offs, corporate sustainability, dilemmas, conflicts, sustainable development
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-189766DOI: 10.1002/bse.674ISI: 000289731800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77953669174OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-189766DiVA, id: diva2:1612979
Available from: 2021-11-19 Created: 2021-11-19 Last updated: 2021-11-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Figge, Frank

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Figge, Frank
In the same journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 200 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf