Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Revegetation through seeding or planting: a worldwide systematic map
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; INRAE, University of Bordeaux, BIOGECO, Cestas, France.
Department of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
INRAE, University of Bordeaux, BIOGECO, Cestas, France.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN 0301-4797, E-ISSN 1095-8630, Vol. 337, article id 117713Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Roughly 2 billion ha of land are degraded and in need of ecological restoration worldwide. Active restoration frequently involves revegetation, which leads to the dilemma of whether to conduct direct seeding or to plant nursery-grown seedlings. The choice of revegetation method can regulate plant survival and performance, with economic implications that ultimately feed back to our capacity to conduct restoration. We followed a peer-reviewed protocol to develop a systematic map that collates, describes and catalogues the available studies on how seeding compares to planting in achieving restoration targets. We compiled a database with the characteristics of all retrieved studies, which can be searched to identify studies of particular locations and habitats, objectives of restoration, plant material, technical aspects, and outcomes measured. The search was made in eight languages and retrieved 3355 publications, of which 178 were retained. The systematic map identifies research gaps, such as a lack of studies in the global South, in tropical rainforests, and covering a long time period, which represent opportunities to expand field-based research. Additionally, many studies overlooked reporting on important technical aspects such as seed provenance and nursery cultivation methods, and others such as watering or seedling protection were more frequently applied for planting than for seeding, which limits our capacity to learn from past research. Most studies measured outcomes related to the target plants but avoided measuring general restoration outcomes or economic aspects. This represents a relevant gap in research, as the choice of revegetation method is greatly based on economic aspects and the achievement of restoration goals goes beyond the establishment of plants. Finally, we identified a substantial volume of studies conducted in temperate regions and over short periods (0–5 y). This research cluster calls for a future in-depth synthesis, potentially through meta-analysis, to reveal the overall balance between seeding and planting and assess whether the response to this question is mediated by species traits, environmental characteristics, or technical aspects. Besides identifying research clusters and gaps, the systematic map database allows managers to find the most relevant scientific literature on the appropriateness of seeding vs. planting for particular conditions, such as certain species or habitats.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2023. Vol. 337, article id 117713
Keywords [en]
Forestry, Nursery, Reforestation, Seedling, Sowing, UN Decade on ecosystem restoration
National Category
Botany
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-206008DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117713ISI: 000972739800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85150441855OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-206008DiVA, id: diva2:1746408
Available from: 2023-03-28 Created: 2023-03-28 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3080 kB)193 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3080 kBChecksum SHA-512
e38d3c66633e5ba429fd1f453680ad3bf49117d7421315c8f510bf3bd42b957203b3bd0e64532689917224f9cff02f6af618cccceda1325fca4b7c31a6bbb5bb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hasegawa, Shun

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hasegawa, Shun
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Botany

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 193 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 157 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf