Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of and attitudes towards a standardized content description of interdisciplinary rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic pain: a qualitative study
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2916-0628
The Center for Health and Medical Psychology, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, ISSN 1661-7827, E-ISSN 1660-4601, Vol. 20, no 9, article id 5661Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation (IPR) is a recommended treatment for people with chronic pain. An inadequate description of the content of IPR programs makes it difficult to draw conclusions regarding their effects. The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions and attitudes of healthcare professionals toward a content description of IPR programs for patients with chronic pain. Individual interviews with healthcare professionals (n = 11) working in IPR teams in Sweden were conducted between February and May 2019. Analysis of the interviews resulted in a theme: interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation is a complex intervention, with three categories: limitations in the description of IPR programs; lack of knowledge about IPR and chronic pain; and facilitating and hindering factors for using the content description of IPR programs. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals perceived that IPR programs could be described through a general content description. A general content description could enhance the quality of IPR programs through a better understanding of their content and a comparison of different IPR programs. Healthcare professionals also expressed the importance of a content description being a guide rather than a steering document.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2023. Vol. 20, no 9, article id 5661
Keywords [en]
complex interventions, content description, healthcare professionals, individual interviews, interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation, TIDieR checklist
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-209118DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20095661PubMedID: 37174179Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85159055565OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-209118DiVA, id: diva2:1763694
Available from: 2023-06-07 Created: 2023-06-07 Last updated: 2023-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(361 kB)91 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 361 kBChecksum SHA-512
25ade30a98e0b752be826f1735ae225c9ef456c6b86a6d6979dcc31e7e4d8d3579149d57b1431583ce87f562c30eb7aa8961537ddc1d25ad27da366e0fd4d4cc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Stålnacke, Britt-Marie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stålnacke, Britt-Marie
By organisation
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation
In the same journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Occupational Health and Environmental Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 92 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 163 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf