Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sex differences in scientific productivity and impact are largely explained by the proportion of highly productive individuals: a whole-population study of researchers across six disciplines in Sweden
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5366-1169
Department of Social Work and Criminology, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.
2024 (English)In: Studies in Higher Education, ISSN 0307-5079, E-ISSN 1470-174X, Vol. 49, no 1, p. 119-140Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Sex differences in human performance have been documented across a wide array of human endeavours. Males tend to exhibit higher performance in intellectually demanding and competitive domains, and this difference tends to be more pronounced the higher the level of performance. Here, we analyse publishing performance for the whole population of associate and full professors in relatively sex-balanced disciplines, namely Education, Nursing and Caring Science, Psychology, Public Health, Sociology, and Social Work, comprising 426 women and 562 men. We find that sex differences in the number of publications, citations, and citations per publication were small across low and medium levels of productivity, but become more pronounced the higher the level of performance. In the top performing 10% the female proportion decreases from the average 43.2% to 26% (25 F, 71 M), which further decreases to 15% in the top 5%. The results are discussed with respect to the greater male variability hypothesis, sex differences in psychological traits, and environmental factors such as sex discrimination.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2024. Vol. 49, no 1, p. 119-140
Keywords [en]
academe, bibliometrics, greater male variability hypothesis, Sex differences, sex discrimination, social sciences
National Category
Gender Studies Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-210885DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2023.2223638ISI: 001005917000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85161834303OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-210885DiVA, id: diva2:1777951
Funder
Swedish National Board of Health and WelfareAvailable from: 2023-06-30 Created: 2023-06-30 Last updated: 2024-01-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2775 kB)124 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 2775 kBChecksum SHA-512
2ac0f025c4fd385dfe8c2cf8bf558136260844d23cf3e2dc069c0d6c8ac9cdacf29242c2f7c200ab2ed7e707884e559fcaaea4c614282be423c657dcb668ac17
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Madison, Guy

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Madison, Guy
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
Studies in Higher Education
Gender StudiesPsychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 173 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 540 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf