Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Abbey Pain Scale: not sufficiently valid or reliable for assessing pain in patients with advanced cancer
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0125-629X
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1248-5581
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4126-2675
2023 (English)In: Acta Oncologica, ISSN 0284-186X, E-ISSN 1651-226X, Vol. 62, no 8, p. 953-960Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Patients with advanced cancer can be unable to verbalize their pain. The Abbey Pain Scale (APS), an observational tool, is used to assess pain in this setting, but has never been psychometrically tested for people with cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the validity, reliability, and the responsiveness of the APS to opioids for patients with advanced cancer in a palliative oncology care setting.

Material and Methods: Patients with advanced cancer and poor performance status, drowsiness, unconsciousness, or delirium, were assessed for pain using a Swedish translation of the APS (APS-SE) and, if possible, the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The assessments using APS were conducted simultaneously, but independently, by the same raters on two separate occasions, approximately one hour apart. Criterion validity was assessed by comparing the APS and NRS values using Cohen’s kappa (κ). Inter-rater reliability was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency using Cronbach’s α, and responsiveness to opioids using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: Seventy-two patients were included, of whom n = 45 could rate their pain using the NRS. The APS did not detect any of the n = 22 cases of moderate or severe pain self-reported using the NRS. The APS at first assessment had a κ of 0.08 (CI: −0.06 to 0.22) for criterion validity, an ICC of 0.64 (CI: 0.43–0.78) for inter-rater reliability, and a Cronbach’s α of 0.01 for internal consistency. The responsiveness to opioids was z = −2.53 (p = 0.01).

Conclusion: The APS was responsive to opioids but displayed insufficient validity and reliability and did not detect moderate or severe pain as indicated by the NRS. The study showed a very limited clinical use of the APS in patients with advanced cancer.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2023. Vol. 62, no 8, p. 953-960
Keywords [en]
Abbey Pain Scale, cancer, Pain assessment, reliability, responsiveness, validity
National Category
Nursing Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-212109DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2228992ISI: 001019893100001PubMedID: 37382384Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85163716000OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-212109DiVA, id: diva2:1782765
Funder
Cancerforskningsfonden i Norrland, 18-922Västerbotten County Council, 7003533Available from: 2023-07-17 Created: 2023-07-17 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Pain or no pain? That is the question: an evaluation of the observational pain assessment instrument Abbey Pain Scale in patients with cancer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Pain or no pain? That is the question: an evaluation of the observational pain assessment instrument Abbey Pain Scale in patients with cancer
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Smärta eller inte smärta? Det är frågan : en utvärdering av observationssmärtskattningsskalan Abbey Pain Scale vid användning hos patienter med cancer
Abstract [en]

Background: The Abbey Pain Scale (APS) is an observational pain assessment instrument that was created for use among patients with dementia. It is sometimes used in Sweden to assess pain in patients with advanced cancer who are unable to vocalize their pain, but it has never been evaluated in this population.

Aim: To evaluate observational pain assessment for people with advanced cancer in a palliative care setting, focusing on the APS.

Methods: The APS was translated and adapted into a Swedish dementia context through interviews with health care professionals (n=11). The resulting APS-SE was then used in a qualitative content analysis exploring health care professionals’ experience of using the instrument in patients with advanced cancer (n=12). The psychometrics of the APS-SE when used in patients with advanced cancer (n=72) were determined through test-retest and inter-rater reliability, internal consistency reliability, and responsiveness to opioids. Criterion validity was determined against the patients’ self-reported pain (n=45).

Results: The APS-SE was comprehensible by users within dementia care, regardless of their educational and linguistic background. The qualitative analysis revealed that when used in patients with advanced cancer, the APS-SE fulfilled the need for an observational pain assessment instrument, but was not always on target and did not fully suit the clinical situation. The psychometric analysis showed slight criterion validity (κ=0.08) and unacceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α=0.01). The test-retest reliability was good (ICC=0.82) and the inter-rater reliability moderate (ICC=0.64), but the latter had a confidence interval ranging from poor to good. Responsiveness to opioids was demonstrated (p=0.01).

Conclusions: This thesis underscores the need for a specialized observational pain assessment instrument explicitly tailored for patients with advanced cancer. The current lack of a recognized alternative emphasizes the importance of developing such an instrument to address the critical gap in observational pain assessment in the palliative oncology setting.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå University, 2024. p. 95
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 2296
Keywords
Abbey Pain Scale, APS-SE, cancer pain, observational pain assessment, advanced cancer, end-of-life care, palliative oncology
National Category
Cancer and Oncology Nursing
Research subject
Oncology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-223902 (URN)9789180703482 (ISBN)9789180703499 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-06-05, Bergasalen, Norrlands universitetssjukhus, Umeå, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-05-13 Created: 2024-04-30 Last updated: 2024-05-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1157 kB)728 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1157 kBChecksum SHA-512
b9c3389c809e873b4659daf88956442ce78a42afdcb4c8bd7b4c591445bd157db449c5c2a0f5f4c2f1673780235eb25d3a2bcbe9d666962e2d5ded71ed74ae9e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Tegenborg, SussiFransson, PerMartinsson, Lisa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tegenborg, SussiFransson, PerMartinsson, Lisa
By organisation
OncologyDepartment of Nursing
In the same journal
Acta Oncologica
NursingPhysiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 832 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 959 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf