Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Chest wall perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: international survey on attitudes and training needs
Department for Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Section for Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences. Department of Surgery/CLINICUM, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7516-9543
G.Re.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements Fondazione ETS, Naples, Italy; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Breast Surgeon, OH, Cleveland, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: British Journal of Surgery, ISSN 0007-1323, E-ISSN 1365-2168, Vol. 110, no 8, p. 966-972Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Volume replacement using chest wall perforator flaps (CWPFs) is a promising technique to reduce mastectomy rates without sacrificing function or aesthetics. Owing to limited availability of the technique, only a minority of patients currently have access to CWPF procedures.

METHODS: An international web-based survey was disseminated through social media, dedicated webpages, and national and international societies for breast surgery. The survey explored surgeons' attitudes towards CWPFs and their perceived training needs.

RESULTS: Of 619 respondents, 88.4 per cent agreed that CWPF surgery was desirable, with one-third offering it and performing a median of 10 (i.q.r. 5-15) procedures annually. They were more likely to be senior (OR 1.35, 95 per cent c.i. 1.18 to 1.55; P < 0.001), with formal oncoplastic training (OR 4.80, 3.09 to 7.48; P < 0.001), and working in larger units (OR 1.18, 1.03 to 1.35; P = 0.018) with a free-flap (OR 1.62, 1.06 to 2.48; P = 0.025) or CWPF (OR 3.02, 1.87 to 4.89; P < 0.001) service available. In cluster and latent class analysis, none showed high cohesion with performance of CWPF surgery.

CONCLUSION: There is a discrepancy between perceived importance and availability of CWPF surgery, indicating that optimal training is needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2023. Vol. 110, no 8, p. 966-972
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-212402DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad145ISI: 000998282000001PubMedID: 37259179Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85165223027OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-212402DiVA, id: diva2:1784658
Available from: 2023-07-28 Created: 2023-07-28 Last updated: 2024-02-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(210 kB)107 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 210 kBChecksum SHA-512
76a2bd63b6ca81753c955cb83aa71275b7de5966465cbcf16674aa5c2113f906cc3651f0f4ddb0a928e4bb15c63cf4f11235313d096c619a6c07c524eaa203eb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Sund, Malin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sund, Malin
By organisation
Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences
In the same journal
British Journal of Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 107 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 139 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf