Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
All professions can benefit — a mixed-methods study on simulation-based teamwork training for operating room teams
Center for Advanced Medical Simulation and Training (CAMST), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Simulator Centre West, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Center for Advanced Medical Simulation and Training (CAMST), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Center for Advanced Medical Simulation and Training (CAMST), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, ISSN 2364-3277, E-ISSN 2059-0628, Vol. 8, no 1, article id 18Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Operating rooms have become more technically complex due to new advanced procedures, which has increased demands on teamwork in the operating room. In response, team training has been proposed to improve team performance, workplace culture, and patient safety. We developed and delivered a simulation-based team training course for entire professional surgical teams. This type of intervention has been proposed by researchers but has not been widely published. The aims of this intervention study were to examine participants’ reactions to the course in terms of their motivation for the training and their self-efficacy in relation to their performance, as well as their views on transferring the lessons learned in the course to their workplace.

Methods: In a prospective mixed-methods intervention study, operating room professionals participated in a full-day simulation-based teamwork training course. Learning objectives were nontechnical skills, specifically communication and collaboration across the team. Seventy-one staff members representing 5 operating room professions were included, and the average work experience of participants was 6 years. Quantitative data on self-efficacy and situational motivation were collected by questionnaires before and after training. Qualitative data were collected through 5 focus group interviews that took place in direct relation to the courses and included a total of 31 participants. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: All occupations showed a similar pattern in terms of increases in self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation after the training. Analysis of the qualitative data showed that training in one’s profession and in authentic multiprofessional teams was important factors for motivation. Participating staff described an awareness of undesirable communication barriers in surgical teams that can lead to risks for patients. Systematic training was definitely perceived as a means to reduce barriers and improve communication and collaboration.

Conclusion: Simulation-based training was equally well received by all professional groups. Our results confirm the feasibility of this type of training for professional teams and promising opportunities for improving teamwork skills. The qualitative data reveal both opportunities and limitations for transferring the learning experiences to the workplace.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2023. Vol. 8, no 1, article id 18
National Category
Applied Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-212596DOI: 10.1186/s41077-023-00257-0ISI: 001110726500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85165871620OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-212596DiVA, id: diva2:1789666
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 721–2012-5450Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg FoundationAvailable from: 2023-08-21 Created: 2023-08-21 Last updated: 2025-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(948 kB)72 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 948 kBChecksum SHA-512
17807d77d246f3b9d557e83f48703d1f6b0630332a55d878ffa59cbaba5c9796d885b27298f1f83971080932a55405b490d3f57a09673eca6939c3f789b43f01
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hedman, Leif R

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hedman, Leif R
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 79 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 216 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf