Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
SALpingectomy for STERilisation (SALSTER): study protocol for a Swedish multicentre register-based randomised controlled trial
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7865-4560
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 13, no 9, article id e071246Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

INTRODUCTION: Salpingectomy is currently suggested as an alternative to tubal ligation for sterilisation. Precursor lesions of ovarian carcinoma can be found in the fallopian tubes; thus, salpingectomy could possibly reduce the incidence. Most of the existing trials on safety are small, on caesarean section and report on surrogate ovarian function measures. Randomised trials in laparoscopy are lacking. Well-designed trials are needed to evaluate safety of laparoscopic opportunistic salpingectomy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In SALSTER, a national register-based randomised controlled non-inferiority trial, 968 women <50 years, wishing laparoscopic sterilisation will be randomised to either salpingectomy or tubal ligation. The Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery (GynOp) will be used for inclusion, randomisation and follow-up. Primary outcomes are any complication up to 8 weeks postoperatively, and age at menopause. Both outcomes are measured with questionnaires, complications are also assessed by a gynaecologist. In a nested trial, ovarian function will be evaluated comparing the mean difference of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), assessed preoperatively and 1 year after surgery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Performing salpingectomy for sterilisation has become increasingly common, despite the unclear risk-benefit balance. SALSTER studies the safety of salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation. Regardless of the result, SALSTER will provide gynaecologists with high quality evidence to inform women to decide on salpingectomy or not. The central ethical review board of Gothenburg, Sweden (Dnr. 316-18) approved the trial in 2018. Results will be presented at scientific congresses and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. The results will be communicated through professional organisations and research networks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03860805.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2023. Vol. 13, no 9, article id e071246
Keywords [en]
Gynaecological oncology, Gynaecology, Minimally invasive surgery
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-214288DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071246ISI: 001117509700012PubMedID: 37666548Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85169848786OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-214288DiVA, id: diva2:1795836
Available from: 2023-09-11 Created: 2023-09-11 Last updated: 2025-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(276 kB)103 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 276 kBChecksum SHA-512
d6503ecbb4d467562de7d259f7ef99456a16654d983494827e10d93cb771f6bf5e461aae6caf4d0418817d43d309580c6ffb886817cd39b24d3245838736562c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Idahl, AnnikaLiv, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Idahl, AnnikaLiv, Per
By organisation
Obstetrics and GynecologyDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 106 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 317 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf