Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Treatments for hyperemesis gravidarum: a systematic review
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4673-0960
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademin, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6349, E-ISSN 1600-0412, Vol. 103, no 1, p. 13-29Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Hyperemesis gravidarum affects 0.3%–3% of pregnant women each year and is the leading cause of hospitalization in early pregnancy. Previous systematic reviews of available treatments have found a lack of consistent evidence, and few studies of high quality. Since 2016, no systematic review has been conducted and an up-to date review is requested. In a recent James Lind Alliance collaboration, it was clear that research on effective treatments is a high priority for both patients and clinicians.

Material and methods: Searches without time limits were performed in the AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases until June 26, 2023. Studies published before October 1, 2014 were identified from the review by O'Donnell et al., 2016. Selection criteria were randomized clinical trials and non-randomized studies of interventions comparing treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum with another treatment or placebo. Outcome variables included were: degree of nausea; vomiting; inability to tolerate oral fluids or food; hospital treatment; health-related quality of life, small-for-gestational-age infant; and preterm birth. Abstracts and full texts were screened, and risk of bias of the studies was assessed independently by two authors. Synthesis without meta-analysis was performed, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. PROSPERO (CRD42022303150).

Results: Twenty treatments were included in 25 studies with low or moderate risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was very low for all treatments except for acupressure in addition to standard care, which showed a possible moderate decrease in nausea and vomiting, with low certainty of evidence.

Conclusions: Several scientific knowledge gaps were identified. Studies on treatments for hyperemesis gravidarum are few, and the certainty of evidence for different treatments is either low or very low. To establish more robust evidence, it is essential to use validated scoring systems, the recently established diagnostic criteria, clear descriptions and measurements of core outcomes and to perform larger studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2024. Vol. 103, no 1, p. 13-29
Keywords [en]
hyperemesis gravidarum, intervention, nausea, PUQE, quality of life, systematic review, treatment, vomiting
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-216141DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14706ISI: 001088462100001PubMedID: 37891710Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85174970807OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-216141DiVA, id: diva2:1809289
Note

First published: 27 October 2023.

Available from: 2023-11-02 Created: 2023-11-02 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1172 kB)106 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1172 kBChecksum SHA-512
64cec9d193286e13c76cc5e457113e2c0318f0714de7bc6df0dd0e9c3003b4e8844c3fa9b86a58deecc7b32d87b16c2da73fc5e3f84f8a77ba9c2b735752de45
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Vinnars, Marie-Therese

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vinnars, Marie-Therese
By organisation
Obstetrics and Gynecology
In the same journal
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 136 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 310 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf