Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effectiveness of intergenerational exchange programs between adolescents and older adults: a systematic review
Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3014-3374
Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics. (Q-life)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9419-0682
Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
2024 (English)In: Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, ISSN 1535-0770, E-ISSN 1535-0932, Vol. 22, no 4, p. 603-644Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Communities are aging and becoming more segregated, leading to fractured relationships between generations. Intergenerational exchange has improved cohesion, particularly when different generations engage as equal partners. This paper presents a systematic review of intergenerational studies between adolescents and older adults. Thirteen papers were reviewed using PRISMA guidelines, and outcomes, methodological quality, facilitators, and barriers identified, to better understand effectiveness and inform recommendations for future practice. The framework informed quality assessment, and the papers were rated moderate or high quality. Unfortunately, heterogeneity across studies rendered comparison challenging. Further attention is required to elucidate guidelines for implementing and reporting intergenerational studies.Contribution to the Field 

This review demonstrated how non-familial intergenerational programs involving adolescents and older adults provided benefits to both. Benefits for older adults included improved wellbeing, cognitive, and social engagement.Benefits for adolescents were identity formation and skill development. Shared outcomes for both generations were improved attitudes and stereotypes, reduced generational gap, and solidarity.High variability in program design, methodology, and sample size was evident across studies. However, it highlighted the suitability of IG engagement across differing contexts.Future recommendations included facilitator training, diverse samples, and longitudinal methodological designs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2024. Vol. 22, no 4, p. 603-644
Keywords [en]
Intergenerational relations, adolescent, older adult, systematic review
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Research subject
health services research
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-216400DOI: 10.1080/15350770.2023.2267532ISI: 001092160900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85175851489OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-216400DiVA, id: diva2:1811119
Available from: 2023-11-10 Created: 2023-11-10 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1271 kB)79 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1271 kBChecksum SHA-512
8fecce9c09a714560209569361931669f847106208fa43950bd36b2119ffea4fed0fcaa4ae7feb10bc5a820328cc3df98280ab58d55fa2be7faa47940c1d57d0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Waterworth, John

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Webster, MaryWaterworth, John
By organisation
Department of Informatics
In the same journal
Journal of Intergenerational Relationships
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 314 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 365 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf