Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Organizational readiness to implement the serious illness care program in hospital settings in Sweden
Center for Collaborative Palliative Care, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1728-5722
Center for Collaborative Palliative Care, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
2022 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 22, no 1, article id 539Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) is a model developed for structured communication, identifying patients, and training physicians to use a structured guide for conversations with patients and family members. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the sustainable implementation of this conversation model. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers during the implementation of the SICP in hospital settings.

METHODS: The SICP was implemented at 20 units in two hospitals in Sweden. During the implementation process, seven individual interviews and two group interviews were conducted with seven facilitators (five physicians, one behavioral therapist, and one administrator). Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, first inductively, and then deductively using the organizational readiness for change as a theoretical framework.

RESULT: The analysis resulted in three factors acting as enablers and eight factors acting as enablers and/or barriers during the implementation of the SICP. The three factors considered as enablers were preliminaries, identifying patients, and facilitator's role. The eight factors considered as enablers and/or barriers were broad implementation, leadership, time, confidence, building foundation, motivation to work change, motivation for training in serious illness conversations, and attitudes.

CONCLUSION: This study indicates limited readiness to implement the SICP in hospital settings due to considerable variation in organizational contextual factors, change efficacy, and change commitment. The identified enablers and barriers for implementation of the SICP could guide and support future implementations to be sustainable over time.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2022. Vol. 22, no 1, article id 539
Keywords [en]
Conversation, Implementation, Organization readiness for change, Palliative care, Qualitative, Serious illness, Serious illness program
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-216621DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07923-5ISI: 000785607300011PubMedID: 35459204Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85128729823OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-216621DiVA, id: diva2:1811724
Available from: 2023-11-14 Created: 2023-11-14 Last updated: 2023-11-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(889 kB)60 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 889 kBChecksum SHA-512
0ae57198150651e6c9506951229d54e4eb86a6470e97d0f9078f2e8e4e48157c3264bea99c7ce1c6ffbd22b65e3b9969a3c603a8886f114480103b211c3ff331
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Andersson, Sofia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, Sofia
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 61 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 332 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf