Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Thirty years of global deep brain stimulation: "plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose"?
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences. UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5930-6037
Laboratoire de Recherche en Neurosciences Cliniques, Montpellier, France.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences.
2023 (English)In: Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, ISSN 1011-6125, E-ISSN 1423-0372, Vol. 101, no 6, p. 395-406Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The advent of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease 30 years ago has ushered a global breakthrough of DBS as a universal method for therapy and research in wide areas of neurology and psychiatry. The literature of the last three decades has described numerous concepts and practices of DBS, often branded as novelties or discoveries. However, reading the contemporary publications often elicits a sense of déjà vu in relation to several methods, attributes, and practices of DBS. Here, we review various applications and techniques of the modern-era DBS and compare them with practices of the past.

Summary: Compared with modern literature, publications of the old-era functional stereotactic neurosurgery, including old-era DBS, show that from the very beginning multidisciplinarity and teamwork were often prevalent and insisted upon, ethical concerns were recognized, brain circuitries and rational for brain targets were discussed, surgical indications were similar, closed-loop stimulation was attempted, evaluations of surgical results were debated, and controversies were common. Thus, it appears that virtually everything done today in the field of DBS bears resemblance to old-Time practices, or has been done before, albeit with partly other tools and techniques. Movement disorders remain the main indications for modern DBS as was the case for lesional surgery and old-era DBS. The novelties today consist of the STN as the dominant target for DBS, the tremendous advances in computerized brain imaging, the sophistication and versatility of implantable DBS hardware, and the large potential for research.

Key Messages: Many aspects of contemporary DBS bear strong resemblance to practices of the past. The dominant clinical indications remain movement disorders with virtually the same brain targets as in the past, with one exception: The STN. Other novel brain targets-that are so far subject to DBS trials-are the pedunculopontine nucleus for gait freezing, the anteromedial internal pallidum for Gilles de la Tourette and the fornix for Alzheimer's disease. The major innovations and novelties compared to the past concern mainly the unmatched level of research activity, its high degree of sponsorship, and the outstanding advances in technology that have enabled multimodal brain imaging and the miniaturization, versatility, and sophistication of implantable hardware. The greatest benefit for patients today, compared to the past, is the higher level of precision and safety of DBS, and of all functional stereotactic neurosurgery.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
S. Karger, 2023. Vol. 101, no 6, p. 395-406
Keywords [en]
Deep brain stimulation, Depth electrodes, Ethics, Functional neurosurgery, History, Lesion, Multidisciplinarity, Parkinson's disease, Subthalamic nucleus
National Category
Neurology Neurosciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-216655DOI: 10.1159/000533430ISI: 001091093100001PubMedID: 37844558Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85175805744OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-216655DiVA, id: diva2:1815399
Available from: 2023-11-28 Created: 2023-11-28 Last updated: 2025-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(321 kB)122 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 321 kBChecksum SHA-512
f19ee2658e7b57b3084a2c9416a8896c7227327a4460141a4d11574bb49ae01751bc81e63d6d2a160abc3d805106ecc88c75e957bba9b7668b970f999c7898af
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Hariz, MarwanBlomstedt, Patric

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hariz, MarwanBlomstedt, Patric
By organisation
Neurosciences
In the same journal
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
NeurologyNeurosciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 132 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 310 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf