Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Response of lake metabolism to catchment inputs inferred using high-frequency lake and stream data from across the northern hemisphere
School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, NE, Lincoln, United States.
Integrated Information Dissemination Division, U.S. Geological Survey, CA, San Francisco, United States.
Biology Department, Fairfield University, CT, Fairfield, United States.
Environmental Studies Department, Colby College, ME, Waterville, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Limnology and Oceanography, ISSN 0024-3590, E-ISSN 1939-5590, Vol. 68, no 12, p. 2617-2631Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In lakes, the rates of gross primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (R), and net ecosystem production (NEP) are often controlled by resource availability. Herein, we explore how catchment vs. within lake predictors of metabolism compare using data from 16 lakes spanning 39°N to 64°N, a range of inflowing streams, and trophic status. For each lake, we combined stream loads of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) with lake DOC, TN, and TP concentrations and high frequency in situ monitoring of dissolved oxygen. We found that stream load stoichiometry indicated lake stoichiometry for C : N and C : P (r2 = 0.74 and r2 = 0.84, respectively), but not for N : P (r2 = 0.04). As we found a strong positive correlation between TN and TP, we only used TP in our statistical models. For the catchment model, GPP and R were best predicted by DOC load, TP load, and load N : P (R2 = 0.85 and R2 = 0.82, respectively). For the lake model, GPP and R were best predicted by TP concentrations (R2 = 0.86 and R2 = 0.67, respectively). The inclusion of N : P in the catchment model, but not the lake model, suggests that both N and P regulate metabolism and that organisms may be responding more strongly to catchment inputs than lake resources. Our models predicted NEP poorly, though it is unclear why. Overall, our work stresses the importance of characterizing lake catchment loads to predict metabolic rates, a result that may be particularly important in catchments experiencing changing hydrologic regimes related to global environmental change.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2023. Vol. 68, no 12, p. 2617-2631
National Category
Oceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-216880DOI: 10.1002/lno.12449ISI: 001098633000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85176234704OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-216880DiVA, id: diva2:1818710
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 210-2012-1461The Kempe Foundations, SMK-1240Available from: 2023-12-12 Created: 2023-12-12 Last updated: 2024-01-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1803 kB)55 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1803 kBChecksum SHA-512
1cd829c359142f2c2c6b91babdc72ba1018f5952bea1d8eb94ccc9783d11f69b75e044766315861dc44366378ce635a4389fccd727259c7bc864070c9dd58c36
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Karlsson, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karlsson, Jan
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Limnology and Oceanography
Oceanography, Hydrology and Water ResourcesEcology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 71 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 297 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf