Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comparative trial of blood pressure monitoring in a self-care kiosk, in office, and with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1640-0813
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6230-0354
2024 (English)In: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, E-ISSN 1471-2261, Vol. 24, no 1, article id 27Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Automated measurement of blood pressure (BP) in designated BP kiosks have in recent years been introduced in primary care. If kiosk blood pressure (BP) monitoring provides results equivalent to in-office BP or daytime ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), follow-up of adult patients could be managed primarily by self-checks. We therefore designed a comparative trial and evaluated the diagnostic performance of kiosk- and office-based BP (nurse- versus physician-measured) compared with daytime ABPM.

Methods: A trial of automated BP monitoring in three settings: a designated BP kiosk, by nurses and physicians in clinic, and by ABPM. The primary outcome was systolic and diastolic BP, with respective diagnostic thresholds of ≥135 mmHg and/or ≥ 85 mmHg for daytime ABPM and kiosk BP and ≥ 140 mmHg and/or ≥ 90 mmHg for office BP (nurse- and physician-measured).

Results: Compared with daytime ABPM, mean systolic kiosk BP was higher by 6.2 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8–8.6) and diastolic by 7.9 mmHg (95% CI 6.2–9.6; p < 0.001). Mean systolic BP taken by nurses was similar to daytime ABPM values (+ 2.0 mmHg; 95% CI − 0.2–4.2; p = 0.071), but nurse-measured diastolic values were higher, by 7.2 mmHg (95% CI 5.9–9.6; p < 0.001). Mean systolic and diastolic physician-measured BPs were higher compared with daytime ABPM (systolic, by 7.6 mmHg [95% CI 4.5–10.2] and diastolic by 5.8 mmHg [95% CI 4.1–7.6]; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curves of BP monitoring across pairs of systolic/diastolic cut-off levels among the three settings, with daytime ABPM as reference, demonstrated overall similar diagnostic performance between kiosk and nurse-measured values and over the curve performance for physician-measured BP. Accuracy with nurse-measured BP was 69.2% (95% CI 60.0–77.4%), compared with 65.8% (95% CI 56.5–74.3%) for kiosk BP.

Conclusions: In this study kiosk BP monitoring was not comparable to daytime ABPM but could be an alternative to in-office BP monitoring by trained nurses. The diagnostic performance of kiosk and nurse-measured BP monitoring was similar and better than that of physician-measured BP.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024. Vol. 24, no 1, article id 27
Keywords [en]
Ambulatory blood pressure, Clinical trial, Self-blood pressure monitoring
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-219316DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03701-1ISI: 001136345000004PubMedID: 38172659Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85181402143OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-219316DiVA, id: diva2:1827230
Funder
Region Jämtland HärjedalenAvailable from: 2024-01-12 Created: 2024-01-12 Last updated: 2025-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1173 kB)113 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1173 kBChecksum SHA-512
3702bafae16cde445a6744dc2d99a43a2f41790ff21b2b6e2de1f629021b7bb191e8e8f2ab6a58dcf56cf39b1e10d933c911d5527dd04f4d861594ad68ea4c91
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Nilsson, GunnarLindam, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsson, GunnarLindam, Anna
By organisation
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine
In the same journal
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 113 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 346 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf