Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Den antagna plikten att arbeta: En kritisk granskning av Michael Cholbis artikel ”The Duty to Work”
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of historical, philosophical and religious studies.
2024 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
The Assumed Duty to Work : A critical analysis of the article “The Duty to Work” by Michael Cholbi (English)
Abstract [en]

In our society it’s implied that humans have a duty to work. In his article “The Duty to Work” the philosopher Michael Cholbi (2018) challenging that normative narrative of our contemporary society. Cholbi hold the thesis that the common argument of fair play is invalid in our industrialized society and therefore are most individuals living in the circumstances of such society free from the interpersonal duty to work. I will in this paper analyse Cholbis’ arguments and try to bring nuance to the debate by bringing in other perspectives such as empirical studies about empty labor (meaningless work) of sociologist Roland Paulsen (2015). I will also try to show how structural powers hinders the individual to both talk and act outside of the norms of our work centred culture. The duty to work can be described in two aspects, the interpersonal duty to work, but also personal. I will argue that for most individuals, either personal or interpersonal duty exists.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. , p. 23
Keywords [sv]
Arbete, Arbetsplikt, Michael Cholbi, Empty labor, Duty to work, Tomt arbete, Lönearbete, Kooperativa system, Kollektiva nyttigheter, Ömsesidighet, Arbetsnorm, Arbetsnormer, Arbetskultur, Arbetskritik, Epistemologisk otur, Tolkningsmarginalisering, Arbetssamhälle, Sociala maktfaktorer, Strukturellt förtryck.
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-220972OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-220972DiVA, id: diva2:1838244
Subject / course
Philosophy
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2024-02-15 Created: 2024-02-15 Last updated: 2024-02-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(349 kB)75 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 349 kBChecksum SHA-512
f26cef9ad7ab46ecdcf959a0db926def1fce6911db15cc8c08dce33dfdd993d75acd664595337b1d1029f85cb31c3e08c82962fdc13b61c2430768b501a85103
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of historical, philosophical and religious studies
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 75 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 434 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf