Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intercostal nerve transfer for biceps reinnervation in obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: a preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis for individual patient data systematic review using individualized fusion and comparison to supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, NJ, Newark, United States.
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, NJ, Newark, United States.
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, NJ, Newark, United States.
Department of Statistics, Rutgers University, NJ, Piscataway, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, ISSN 1863-2521, E-ISSN 1863-2548, Vol. 18, no 1, p. 54-63Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: The objective of this study was to search existing literature on nerve reconstruction surgery in patients with obstetric brachial plexus palsy to determine whether treatment with supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting produced better elbow flexion outcomes compared to intercostal nerve transfer.

Methods: This study was a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Individual Patient Data guidelines. A systematic search was conducted using multiple databases. An ordinal regression model was used to analyze the effect of using supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting or intercostal nerve on elbow flexion with the two scores measured: elbow flexion Medical Research Council scores and Toronto active movements scale scores for elbow flexion.

Results: A final patient database from 6 published articles consisted of 83 supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting patients (73 patients with Medical Research Council and 10 patients with Toronto score) and 7 published articles which consisted of 131 intercostal nerve patients (84 patients with Medical Research Council and 47 patients with Toronto scores). Patients who underwent supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting presented with an average Medical Research Council score of 3.9 ± 0.72 and an average Toronto score of 6.2 ± 2.2. Patients who underwent intercostal nerve transfer presented with an average Medical Research Council score of 3.9 ± 0.71 and an average Toronto score of 6.4 ± 1.2. There was no statistical difference between supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting and intercostal nerve transfer when utilizing Medical Research Council elbow flexion scores (ordinal regression: 0.3821, standard error: 0.4590, p = 0.2551) or Toronto Active Movement Scale score for elbow flexion (ordinal regression: 0.7154, standard error: 0.8487, p = 0.2188).

Conclusion: Regardless of surgical intervention utilized (supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting or intercostal nerve transfers), patients had excellent outcomes for elbow flexion following obstetric brachial plexus palsy when utilizing Medical Research Council or Toronto scores for elbow flexion. The difference between these scores was not statistically significant.

Type of study/Level of evidence: Therapeutic Study: Investigating the Result of Treatment/level III.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2024. Vol. 18, no 1, p. 54-63
Keywords [en]
elbow flexion, intercostal, nerve grafting, nerve transfer, Obstetric brachial plexus palsy
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-221854DOI: 10.1177/18632521231211644ISI: 001159149500002PubMedID: 38348437Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85185481115OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-221854DiVA, id: diva2:1843791
Available from: 2024-03-12 Created: 2024-03-12 Last updated: 2024-03-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(908 kB)113 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 908 kBChecksum SHA-512
30216f56ef26a138af11c0f376e11fb83383ca2961173628c3b0fcc6448ad45b120c884d1c5f29c4e9bdc2a73db00ccbba9a7f5ce7c564767a7b1492f172a981
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

McGrath, Aleksandra M

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
McGrath, Aleksandra M
By organisation
Anatomy
In the same journal
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 113 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 405 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf