Rejoinder on ‘Marked spatial point processes: current state and extensions to point processes on linear networks’
2024 (English)In: Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics, ISSN 1085-7117, E-ISSN 1537-2693, Vol. 29, no 2, p. 405-416Article in journal, Letter (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]
We are grateful to all discussants for their invaluable comments, suggestions, questions, and contributions to our article. We have attentively reviewed all discussions with keen interest. In this rejoinder, our objective is to address and engage with all points raised by the discussants in a comprehensive and considerate manner. Consistently, we identify the discussants, in alphabetical order, as follows: CJK for Cronie, Jansson, and Konstantinou, DS for Stoyan, GP for Grabarnik and Pommerening, MRS for Myllymäki, Rajala, and Särkkä, and MCvL for van Lieshout throughout this rejoinder.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2024. Vol. 29, no 2, p. 405-416
Keywords [en]
Intensity, Mark filtering, Mark models, Mark space, Summary characteristics
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-223084DOI: 10.1007/s13253-024-00613-1ISI: 001191066000006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85189020727OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-223084DiVA, id: diva2:1851523
Funder
German Research Foundation (DFG), 467634837
Note
This article is response to commentaries for DOI:
10.1007/s13253-024-00606-0,
10.1007/s13253-024-00607-z
10.1007/s13253-024-00608-y
10.1007/s13253-024-00609-x
10.1007/s13253-024-00610-4
2024-04-152024-04-152024-07-02Bibliographically approved